1997
DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1997.tb01508.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surrogate and Physician Understanding of Patients' Preferences for Living Permanently in a Nursing Home

Abstract: Patient attitudes about living permanently in a nursing home can be elicited, cannot be reliably predicted from demographic and clinical variables, and are frequently misunderstood by surrogates and physicians. Elicitation of patient preferences regarding permanent nursing home placement should be explored before patients become unable to participate in decision making in order to enhance the concordance of patient preference with the way they spend the end of their lives.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
101
0
2

Year Published

1999
1999
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 168 publications
(105 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
(37 reference statements)
2
101
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Pressure on beds may preclude both older people and their carers from exercising a genuinely informed choice (Lundh et al, 2000). It is usually a family member who takes the lead in MCEVOY, J. P., APPLEBAUM, P. S., APPERSON, L. J., et al (1989a) Why must some schizophrenic patients be both the decision to seek and find a care home, but surrogates may frequently misunderstand patient preferences in relation to living permanently in a nursing home (Mattimore et al, 1997). The person undertaking the intervention should explain it and assess capacity, in this case the social worker involved.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pressure on beds may preclude both older people and their carers from exercising a genuinely informed choice (Lundh et al, 2000). It is usually a family member who takes the lead in MCEVOY, J. P., APPLEBAUM, P. S., APPERSON, L. J., et al (1989a) Why must some schizophrenic patients be both the decision to seek and find a care home, but surrogates may frequently misunderstand patient preferences in relation to living permanently in a nursing home (Mattimore et al, 1997). The person undertaking the intervention should explain it and assess capacity, in this case the social worker involved.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…17,18,21,[25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32] In such studies, individuals are asked what they would want for themselves in particular circumstances. Their loved ones or designated proxies are then asked to predict what the patient would have wanted.…”
Section: The Evidence Against Substituted Judgmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A second line of research examines the concordance between a patient and his or her doctors, [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24] or chosen surrogates. 17,18,21,[25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32] In such studies, individuals are asked what they would want for themselves in particular circumstances.…”
Section: The Evidence Against Substituted Judgmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, the evidence is unclear as to whether HCBSs can fully substitute for nursing home care or significantly delay permanent nursing home admissions (Miller & Weissert, 2000). Moreover, most older adults prefer to avoid nursing home placement whenever possible (Bishop, 1999;Mattimore, Wenger, & Desbiens, 1997). Even among seriously ill older adults, 29% prefer to die rather than enter a nursing home (Mattimore et al).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%