2006
DOI: 10.1007/11617990_11
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surreal Numbers in Coq

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Mamane [19] develops the theory of surreal numbers in the proof assistant Coq, using an encoding to reduce the inductive-inductive definition to an ordinary inductive one. …”
Section: Examples Of Inductive-inductive Definitionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mamane [19] develops the theory of surreal numbers in the proof assistant Coq, using an encoding to reduce the inductive-inductive definition to an ordinary inductive one. …”
Section: Examples Of Inductive-inductive Definitionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The licensing situation in the world of free works 11 within the two categories (executable software code on the one hand, and documents for human consumption on the other hand) has clear "winners". On the code side, statistics [16,9,24] based on web scraping of contents of large free/open source software repositories (such as SourceForge or freshmeat) show that slightly more than a half of FLOSS 12 code is under a variant of the GNU General Public License: Data from the FLOSSmole project [4] as of March 2011 shows that out of a total of 43 470 FLOSS projects tracked by freshmeat, 24 366 are licensed under a version of the GNU GPL 13 . Of the projects hosted on SourceForge, 110 412 use a variant of the GPL, out of 174 227 that use a license approved by the Open Source Initiative.…”
Section: Code and Text Licensesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the third author chose Coq over Mizar for formalisation of surreal (Conway) numbers[13] over such an issue, although Mizar's set theory base could have provided a more natural framework for surreal numbers than Coq's type theory.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This transfinite nature can be seen in the way the arithmetic operation on the surreal numbers are evaluated. Therefore a straightforward formalisation of algorithms for computation on the surreal numbers needs a more powerful framework than most present programming languages and should best be done in a framework where higher order types are present, as it is done in Coq [18]. However, the algorithms that we present for the Stern-Brocot arithmetic can be implemented in ordinary programming languages.…”
Section: Remarkmentioning
confidence: 99%