2012
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4614-3520-4_26
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surprise Detection in Multivariate Astronomical Data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In recent decades of years, a variety of researches have proposed different kinds of outlier detection methods. [3] introduced a method based on statistics, which considers an outlier as data whose distribution of distances between itself and its K-nearest neighbors is different from the distribution of distances among the K-nearest neighbors alone. Furthermore, a distance-based method has been put forward in [4], combining the use of random number and pruning function to shorten the running time of the outlier detection algorithm.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In recent decades of years, a variety of researches have proposed different kinds of outlier detection methods. [3] introduced a method based on statistics, which considers an outlier as data whose distribution of distances between itself and its K-nearest neighbors is different from the distribution of distances among the K-nearest neighbors alone. Furthermore, a distance-based method has been put forward in [4], combining the use of random number and pruning function to shorten the running time of the outlier detection algorithm.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The methods above have their own advantages. However, the efficiency of the algorithms [3] [5] is low, which makes them difficult to keep the balance between high precision and low error as data size grows dramatically. The approach in [4] employs a randomized nested-looping algorithm, and is effective for the multi-dimensional data sets.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%