2017
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.96.094506
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surmounting the sign problem in nonrelativistic calculations: A case study with mass-imbalanced fermions

Abstract: The calculation of the ground state and thermodynamics of mass-imbalanced Fermi systems is a challenging many-body problem. Even in one spatial dimension, analytic solutions are limited to special configurations and numerical progress with standard Monte Carlo approaches is hindered by the sign problem. The focus of the present work is on the further development of methods to study imbalanced systems in a fully nonperturbative fashion. We report our calculations of the ground-state energy of mass-imbalanced fe… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
77
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(84 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
4
77
2
Order By: Relevance
“…[14] and also Refs. [11,15] where this has also been observed in the case of imaginary mass imbalances. Apart from that, an understanding of the emergence of the discrepancy between CL and perturbation theory for repulsive interactions and βµ > 0 with increasing imbalances requires a more detailed analysis, also with respect to the applicability of CL in this regime [9,10].…”
Section: Polarized Systemmentioning
confidence: 54%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[14] and also Refs. [11,15] where this has also been observed in the case of imaginary mass imbalances. Apart from that, an understanding of the emergence of the discrepancy between CL and perturbation theory for repulsive interactions and βµ > 0 with increasing imbalances requires a more detailed analysis, also with respect to the applicability of CL in this regime [9,10].…”
Section: Polarized Systemmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…However, for a moderately-sized window about ξ 0.1, the calculation becomes well-controlled and converges quickly to the expected value, see also Ref. [11] for a detailed study of the role of this parameter for mass-balanced Fermi gases. The distribution of values of the determinant also indicates that zeros in the determinants are not seen, at least for the couplings studied.…”
Section: Complex Langevin Formalismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This prevents the use of traditional Monte Carlo methods, since they use e −S as a probability weight. One alternative in this scenario is the complex Langevin technique, which has been used to study theories with sign problems such as those with repulsive interactions [24] as well as polarized [25,26] and massimbalanced fermions [27] (see Ref. [28] for a review), finite density QCD with staggered quarks [29][30][31][32], random matrix models [33,34], rotating bosons [35,36], superstringinspired matrix models [37], among others.…”
Section: Many-body Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, our result suggests that the FRG-DFT is a promising way for the analysis of not only ground states but also excited states of the quantum many-body systems. The FRG-DFT is expected to be adapted to various systems because our formalism can be naturally extended to higher-dimensional systems, and systems with internal degrees of freedom [24,25], superfluidity, and finite temperature.…”
Section: Shown Inmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The FRG-DFT method has also been applied to a (1+1)-dimensional many-body model simulating one-dimensional nucleons with a fixed particlenumber formalism [23], although the bound-state energy was underestimated by approximately 30% in comparison with the exact solution in two-particle system and over 17% in comparison with the results obtained using the Monte Carlo method [27] when the number of particles is no more than eight. In addition, the study of (1+1)-dimensional systems composed of finite number of spin-1/2 fermions interacting via a contact interaction has been reported [24,25].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%