2020
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-62028-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surgically Resected Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Patient Survival and Clinicopathological Prognostic Factors

Abstract: We aimed to report patients' survival after surgical resection of eScc and to ascertain the clinical, imaging, and pathological factors related to patient prognosis. This retrospective study included 435 patients with eScc of Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
(8 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“… 22 , 23 Previous studies showed that pretreatment 18 F-FDG PET was able to differentiate superficial tumor infiltrations and correlated with clinicopathological prognosis. 24 26 18 F-FDG PET also has a clinical usage for prognostic stratification. Duong et al 27 showed that 18 F-FDG PET altered the clinical management in esophageal cancer and enabled superior prognostic stratification over conventional modalities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 22 , 23 Previous studies showed that pretreatment 18 F-FDG PET was able to differentiate superficial tumor infiltrations and correlated with clinicopathological prognosis. 24 26 18 F-FDG PET also has a clinical usage for prognostic stratification. Duong et al 27 showed that 18 F-FDG PET altered the clinical management in esophageal cancer and enabled superior prognostic stratification over conventional modalities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies have demonstrated that the SUV, MTV, TLG, and ADC may be valuable prognostic factors for esophageal cancer ( 10 , 20 ). However, whether these parameters can be used for the prediction of the pathological stage is still controversial.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies revealed 18 F-FDG PET/MRI to be superior to PET/CT in T staging and at least comparable to PET/CT in N and M staging of a variety of tumors ( 8 , 9 ). In addition, imaging parameters such as the standardized uptake value (SUV) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) of tumors may correlate with staging and prognosis ( 10 ). Preliminary studies showed that PET/MRI may overcome the inherent limitations of PET/CT and CT in T staging of esophageal cancer, and has advantages over other imaging methods in N staging ( 11 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Number of cases Negative, n (%) Positive, n (%) (17) and hazard ratio (HR) and log-rank P-value were calculated. P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.…”
Section: Cin85 Expression -------------------------------------------mentioning
confidence: 99%