2023
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-25066-8_32
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surgical Workflow Recognition: From Analysis of Challenges to Architectural Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Assessment of surgical workflow is critical for evaluating surgeon skill, case complexity and surgery variability. The scarcity of procedure‐specific annotated data hinders the quantitative analysis of surgical workflow, consequently limiting the ability to provide targeted feedback and objective insights 1 . Subjective operative reports are currently the primary source of information regarding surgical workflow.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Assessment of surgical workflow is critical for evaluating surgeon skill, case complexity and surgery variability. The scarcity of procedure‐specific annotated data hinders the quantitative analysis of surgical workflow, consequently limiting the ability to provide targeted feedback and objective insights 1 . Subjective operative reports are currently the primary source of information regarding surgical workflow.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All of these methods utilize what we refer to as latent temporality, which is a non-interpretable, hidden feature representation. While some works utilize twostage architectures, where the temporal stage uses precomputed features from a single timepoint neural network, others use 3D(2D + time) methods, directly considering multiple timepoints [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%