Surgical ward rounds in England: a trainee-led multi-centre study of current practice

Abstract

BackgroundRecent guidance advocates daily consultant-led ward rounds, conducted in the morning with the presence of senior nursing staff and minimising patients on outlying wards. These recommendations aim to improve patient management through timely investigations, treatment and discharge. This study sought to evaluate the current surgical ward round practices in England.MethodsInformation regarding timing and staffing levels of surgical ward rounds was collected prospectively over a one-week period. The location of each patient was also documented. Two surgical trainee research collaboratives coordinated data collection from 19 hospitals and 13 surgical subspecialties.ResultsData from 471 ward rounds involving 5622 patient encounters was obtained. 367 (77.9%) ward rounds commenced before 9am. Of 422 weekday rounds, 190 (45%) were consultant-led compared with 33 of the 49 (67%) weekend rounds. 2474 (44%) patients were seen with a nurse present. 1518 patients (27%) were classified as outliers, with 361 ward rounds (67%) reporting at least one outlying patient.ConclusionRecommendations for daily consultant-led multi disciplinary ward rounds are poorly implemented in surgical practice, and patients continue to be managed on outlying wards. Although strategies may be employed to improve nursing attendance on ward rounds, substantial changes to workforce planning would be required to deliver daily consultant-led care. An increasing political focus on patient outcomes at weekends may prompt changes in these areas.

Surgeon perceived most important factors to achieve the best hospital performance on colorectal cancer surgery: a Dutch modified Delphi method

“…This was in accordance with studies reporting better survival, but also a better adherence to guidelines and a better use of appropriate surgical techniques 27 28. The postoperative presence and accessibility of specialised surgeons and daily presence at ward rounds is considered important by our respondents, although there is little evidence substantiating this 14. The surgeons perceive that specialisation helps in installing preventive measures, and early recognition and better treatment of complications.…”

“…Hence, teamwork, culture and communication between these professionals may be important 11. Another important factor could be the increasing role of specialised gastrointestinal surgeons rather than the general surgeon, in surgery, but also in postoperative management and daily ward rounds 14…”

Understanding antibiotic decision making in surgery—a qualitative analysis

“…The surgical ward round (WR) is a key component of the care of the surgical inpatient. Critical decisions regarding the clinical management of the patient, for example treatment of infections, are made on the WR and it provides a regular opportunity for the team responsible for the care of the patient to come together to discuss the patient [22,23]. One recent qualitative study performed in surgical WRs investigated the key challenges, including the variability in WR practice, faced by patients and healthcare professionals [24].…”

Methodological overview of systematic reviews to establish the evidence base for emergency general surgery

“…Over the past decade this issue has partially been addressed by the Royal College of Surgeons surgical trials initiative. Several multicentre trainee‐led studies have been successfully designed, conducted and reported. Once these trainees complete their surgical training the opportunity for more research will escalate, and the collective experiences and knowledge will equip the surgical community to undertake more difficult trials in the emergency general surgical setting.…”