2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2007.05.074
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surgical vs. percutaneous atrial septal defect closure: Remote effects on left ventricular diastolic function

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 6 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, such devices cause significant artifact during magnetic resonance imaging (MR) of the thorax, although the device itself can be usefully interrogated by MR . Finally, the potential for a long‐term local and systemic chronic foreign body reaction exists as is the possibility of such devices interfering with septal dynamics which may create functional problems in later years . Despite these potential concerns, the ASO device provides a safe, effective platform for atrial defects (ASD) closure in experienced hands.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, such devices cause significant artifact during magnetic resonance imaging (MR) of the thorax, although the device itself can be usefully interrogated by MR . Finally, the potential for a long‐term local and systemic chronic foreign body reaction exists as is the possibility of such devices interfering with septal dynamics which may create functional problems in later years . Despite these potential concerns, the ASO device provides a safe, effective platform for atrial defects (ASD) closure in experienced hands.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%