1993
DOI: 10.1159/000474628
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surgical Treatment of Venous Leakage: Medium-Term Follow-Up

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…35 Ligation of the penile vein immediately following its formation by the merger of the bulbo-urethral and cavernous veins results in a range of reported success rates from 24% to 63% at 12 months, 38,39 to 38% to 71% at two years. 40,41 The only study to assess both 12-and 24-month success rates revealed a significant decline in success of almost 40% during the second 12 months. 38 Again, failures were thought to be secondary to remaining leakage from the crural and deep dorsal vein as well as the peri-prostatic venous plexus.…”
Section: Surgerymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…35 Ligation of the penile vein immediately following its formation by the merger of the bulbo-urethral and cavernous veins results in a range of reported success rates from 24% to 63% at 12 months, 38,39 to 38% to 71% at two years. 40,41 The only study to assess both 12-and 24-month success rates revealed a significant decline in success of almost 40% during the second 12 months. 38 Again, failures were thought to be secondary to remaining leakage from the crural and deep dorsal vein as well as the peri-prostatic venous plexus.…”
Section: Surgerymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Corpus cavernosum electromyography/single potential analysis of cavernous electrical activity has been suggested as a predictive diagnostic parameter for penile venous surgery for venogenic erectile dysfunction [16] and a suboptimal response to surgery may be improved by intracavernous pharmacotherapy [17]. Although a repeat ligation may be suggested, the results have been poor [18].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%