2007
DOI: 10.1007/s00167-006-0252-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surgical treatment of type II floating knee: comparisons of the results of type IIA and type IIB floating knee

Abstract: The prognosis of type II floating knee injuries was not as good as that of type I. Our purpose is to clarify the factors affecting the outcome of type II floating knee injuries. Thirty-five patients (36 limbs) with type II floating knee injury were studied with a mean follow-up of 52 months (26-96). Blake and McBryde had classified these injuries into type I for pure diaphyseal (true type) fracture and type II if the intra-articular involvements are one or more including hip, knee and ankle joints (variant typ… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
29
0
5

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
2
29
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Hee et al25) suggested a preoperative scoring system that considered age, smoking status at time of injury, injury severity scores, open fractures, segmental fractures and comminution to affect the prognosis of the final outcome of these fractures 26). The associated injuries played a major role in the initial outcome of patients with regard to a delay in initial surgery, prolonged duration of surgery, anesthetic exposure and a delay in rehabilitation 27)…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hee et al25) suggested a preoperative scoring system that considered age, smoking status at time of injury, injury severity scores, open fractures, segmental fractures and comminution to affect the prognosis of the final outcome of these fractures 26). The associated injuries played a major role in the initial outcome of patients with regard to a delay in initial surgery, prolonged duration of surgery, anesthetic exposure and a delay in rehabilitation 27)…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study suggested identifying the prognosis factors which affects on the final outcome, a proper preassessment system would be executes by taking account of main factors such as at the time of injury-smoking status, severity scores, open fractures, segmental fractures and comminution [21].For primary surgery, delay duration, long-term surgery, exposure to medication, and late treatment, subsequent injuries play an important role in the patient's initial results [22].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hung et al also found that the intra-articular knee involvement is the most important factor contributing to poorer outcome [11]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%