1986
DOI: 10.1097/00007632-198604000-00004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surgical Treatment of Tumors of the Spine

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
1

Year Published

1991
1991
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Sacral procedures have had historically higher rates of infection than other spinal procedures [5][6][7][8][9][10]. Primary sacral tumors are rare, and experience with postoperative wound complications of these tumors is, therefore, limited to observations on less than 80 patients [2,[11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sacral procedures have had historically higher rates of infection than other spinal procedures [5][6][7][8][9][10]. Primary sacral tumors are rare, and experience with postoperative wound complications of these tumors is, therefore, limited to observations on less than 80 patients [2,[11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…16,17 Other reports recommend a more aggressive approach and require only a 3-month life expectancy. [18][19][20][21] Since it is frequently impossible to determine within months a patient's life expectancy, the decision for surgery should not be based entirely on presumed survival. It is important to consider the patient's quality of life, which can be profoundly improved with timely surgical intervention.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Surgical treatment had been prevented by the thoracolumbar spine's close proximity to the surrounding neurovascular structures, i.e., the aorta, caval vein, myelon and nerve roots. Therefore, an intralesional corpectomy by piecemeal resection was considered as the only feasible surgery [12,22,23,26,33,54,64,68] followed by anterior-posterior stabilization of the resulting segmental spinal defect. However, the overwhelming majority of these intralesional resection patients have shown a poor oncological outcome [17,44,64].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%