Surgical treatment of renal cell carcinoma: Can morphological features of inferior vena cava tumor thrombus on computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging be a prognostic factor?
Abstract:Objectives: To evaluate the impact of morphological features of inferior vena cava thrombus on the overall survival and cancer-specific survival (cancer-specific survival of patients with renal cell carcinoma). Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the records of 156 renal cell carcinoma patients with inferior vena cava thrombus who underwent radical nephrectomy and thrombectomy from 1998 to 2013 at five tertiary centers. Inferior vena cava thrombi were classified as spherical (type I) and spiculated (type II) … Show more
“…[6][7][8] In the study by Choi et al, 156 RCC patients with IVC thrombus were classified into two groups, type I and type II, on the basis of the preoperative morphological characteristics of IVC thrombus on imaging examination. 1 There was a statistically significant difference in thrombus height between the cases with type I thrombi and those with type II thrombi. Although the impact of the extension of IVC thrombus on the oncological outcome after surgical resection remains controversial, it is a very important point to discuss.…”
mentioning
confidence: 83%
“…The article by Choi et al . addresses the impact of morphological characteristics of the inferior vena cava (IVC) tumor thrombus of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) on clinicopathological features including overall survival and cancer‐specific survival . We often experience cases of RCC patients with IVC thrombus whose indication of surgical treatment is controversial.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the study by Choi et al ., 156 RCC patients with IVC thrombus were classified into two groups, type I and type II, on the basis of the preoperative morphological characteristics of IVC thrombus on imaging examination . There was a statistically significant difference in thrombus height between the cases with type I thrombi and those with type II thrombi.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…
The article by Choi et al addresses the impact of morphological characteristics of the inferior vena cava (IVC) tumor thrombus of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) on clinicopathological features including overall survival and cancer-specific survival. 1 We often experience cases of RCC patients with IVC thrombus whose indication of surgical treatment is controversial. As the authors discussed, previous studies have reported several parameters, such as clinical tumor size, histological subtype, the status of distant metastasis, body mass index and performance status, for predicting the prognosis in RCC patients with IVC thrombus.
The article by Choi et al. addresses the impact of morphological characteristics of the inferior vena cava (IVC) tumor thrombus of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) on clinicopathological features including overall survival and cancer-specific survival. 1 We often experience cases of RCC patients with IVC thrombus whose indication of surgical treatment is controversial. As the authors discussed, previous studies have reported several parameters, such as clinical tumor size, histological subtype, the status of distant metastasis, body mass index and performance status, for predicting the prognosis in RCC patients with IVC thrombus. [2][3][4][5] In addition to these parameters, the condition of the thrombus, such as its level and sites, should be considered because they are thought to be associated with the postoperative prognosis in each patient. It is very informative and beneficial for urological surgeons to demonstrate a new parameter for predicting the prognosis of RCC patients with IVC thrombus, "preoperative morphology of IVC thrombus," besides parameters previously reported. [6][7][8] In the study by Choi et al., 156 RCC patients with IVC thrombus were classified into two groups, type I and type II, on the basis of the preoperative morphological characteristics of IVC thrombus on imaging examination.1 There was a statistically significant difference in thrombus height between the cases with type I thrombi and those with type II thrombi. Although the impact of the extension of IVC thrombus on the oncological outcome after surgical resection remains controversial, it is a very important point to discuss. Possible associations between histological findings with such a morphological difference of IVC thrombus are also interesting. However, which mechanism leads to the morphological difference of IVC thrombus and the reason why the morphology of IVC thrombus is associated with the prognosis of RCC patients remain unclear. Further studies with a larger volume are expected to investigate and clarify these points in the future.One important theme of the morphological classification in the present study is whether the imaging examination findings are reproducible. The priority between computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging findings needs to be clarified to prevent confusion from possible discrepancies in them. Although representative findings for each group were shown in figures, we might experience cases of RCC with IVC thrombus whose morphology are difficult to clearly classify.The criteria of this morphological classification need to be more sophisticated and clearer in the future in order to make them more useful in real clinical practice.The present study is expected to be an important step in establishing a novel risk stratification for RCC patients with IVC thrombus, although there were some limitations because of the retrospective and multi-institutional design. Further investigations with a prospective and randomized design are required to confirm such a model. 110
“…[6][7][8] In the study by Choi et al, 156 RCC patients with IVC thrombus were classified into two groups, type I and type II, on the basis of the preoperative morphological characteristics of IVC thrombus on imaging examination. 1 There was a statistically significant difference in thrombus height between the cases with type I thrombi and those with type II thrombi. Although the impact of the extension of IVC thrombus on the oncological outcome after surgical resection remains controversial, it is a very important point to discuss.…”
mentioning
confidence: 83%
“…The article by Choi et al . addresses the impact of morphological characteristics of the inferior vena cava (IVC) tumor thrombus of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) on clinicopathological features including overall survival and cancer‐specific survival . We often experience cases of RCC patients with IVC thrombus whose indication of surgical treatment is controversial.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the study by Choi et al ., 156 RCC patients with IVC thrombus were classified into two groups, type I and type II, on the basis of the preoperative morphological characteristics of IVC thrombus on imaging examination . There was a statistically significant difference in thrombus height between the cases with type I thrombi and those with type II thrombi.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…
The article by Choi et al addresses the impact of morphological characteristics of the inferior vena cava (IVC) tumor thrombus of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) on clinicopathological features including overall survival and cancer-specific survival. 1 We often experience cases of RCC patients with IVC thrombus whose indication of surgical treatment is controversial. As the authors discussed, previous studies have reported several parameters, such as clinical tumor size, histological subtype, the status of distant metastasis, body mass index and performance status, for predicting the prognosis in RCC patients with IVC thrombus.
The article by Choi et al. addresses the impact of morphological characteristics of the inferior vena cava (IVC) tumor thrombus of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) on clinicopathological features including overall survival and cancer-specific survival. 1 We often experience cases of RCC patients with IVC thrombus whose indication of surgical treatment is controversial. As the authors discussed, previous studies have reported several parameters, such as clinical tumor size, histological subtype, the status of distant metastasis, body mass index and performance status, for predicting the prognosis in RCC patients with IVC thrombus. [2][3][4][5] In addition to these parameters, the condition of the thrombus, such as its level and sites, should be considered because they are thought to be associated with the postoperative prognosis in each patient. It is very informative and beneficial for urological surgeons to demonstrate a new parameter for predicting the prognosis of RCC patients with IVC thrombus, "preoperative morphology of IVC thrombus," besides parameters previously reported. [6][7][8] In the study by Choi et al., 156 RCC patients with IVC thrombus were classified into two groups, type I and type II, on the basis of the preoperative morphological characteristics of IVC thrombus on imaging examination.1 There was a statistically significant difference in thrombus height between the cases with type I thrombi and those with type II thrombi. Although the impact of the extension of IVC thrombus on the oncological outcome after surgical resection remains controversial, it is a very important point to discuss. Possible associations between histological findings with such a morphological difference of IVC thrombus are also interesting. However, which mechanism leads to the morphological difference of IVC thrombus and the reason why the morphology of IVC thrombus is associated with the prognosis of RCC patients remain unclear. Further studies with a larger volume are expected to investigate and clarify these points in the future.One important theme of the morphological classification in the present study is whether the imaging examination findings are reproducible. The priority between computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging findings needs to be clarified to prevent confusion from possible discrepancies in them. Although representative findings for each group were shown in figures, we might experience cases of RCC with IVC thrombus whose morphology are difficult to clearly classify.The criteria of this morphological classification need to be more sophisticated and clearer in the future in order to make them more useful in real clinical practice.The present study is expected to be an important step in establishing a novel risk stratification for RCC patients with IVC thrombus, although there were some limitations because of the retrospective and multi-institutional design. Further investigations with a prospective and randomized design are required to confirm such a model. 110
“…The current RCC with IVCTT classification systems, such as the Mayo Clinic [ 16 ], Novick, and Hinman systems, only take into account the TT's location, which may be insufficient to intraoperatively evaluate the probability of IVC invasion [ 17 ]. Moreover, there is still no standard for classifying IVCTT on imaging [ 18 ]. Thus, IVC thrombectomy caused by IVC invasion often requires comprehensive preoperative imaging evaluation.…”
Purpose. Developed a preoperative prediction model based on multimodality imaging to evaluate the probability of inferior vena cava (IVC) vascular wall invasion due to tumor infiltration. Materials and Methods. We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 110 patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) with level I-IV tumor thrombus who underwent radical nephrectomy and IVC thrombectomy between January 2014 and April 2019. The patients were categorized into two groups: 86 patients were used to establish the imaging model, and the data validation was conducted in 24 patients. We measured the imaging parameters and used logistic regression to evaluate the uni- and multivariable associations of the clinical and radiographic features of IVC resection and established an image prediction model to assess the probability of IVC vascular wall invasion. Results. In all of the patients, 46.5% (40/86) had IVC vascular wall invasion. The residual IVC blood flow (OR 0.170 [0.047-0.611];
P
=
0.007
), maximum coronal IVC diameter in mm (OR 1.203 [1.065-1.360];
P
=
0.003
), and presence of bland thrombus (OR 3.216 [0.870-11.887];
P
=
0.080
) were independent risk factors of IVC vascular wall invasion. We predicted vascular wall invasion if the probability was >42% as calculated by:
Ln
Pre
/
1
−
pre
=
0.185
×
maximum
cornal
IVC
diameter
+
1.168
×
bland
thrombus
–
1.770
×
residual
IVC
blood
flow
–
5.857
. To predict IVC vascular wall invasion, a rate of 76/86 (88.4%) was consistent with the actual treatment, and in the validation patients, 21/26 (80.8%) was consistent with the actual treatment. Conclusions. Our model of multimodal imaging associated with IVC vascular wall invasion may be used for preoperative evaluation and prediction of the probability of partial or segmental IVC resection.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.