The paper from Iacoangeli and his colleagues from Ancona and Rome in this issue of Acta Neurochirurgica is timely given the continuing controversy on best treatment options for vestibular schwannomas.Their report is on the preliminary experience with an old approach integrated with the endoscope. The case material includes ten cases of small and medium sized sporadic acoustic neuromas (five cases of 8 and 10 mm, five cases of 11-25 mm), selected on the basis of a favourable anatomy of the temporal bone.It is noteworthy, and rather exceptional in comparison to other's experiences, that only three cases out of ten had a preoperative normal facial nerve function, while four cases of 11-25 mm had a House-Brackmann (HB) grade 3 and three cases of 10 and 20 mm had a HB grade 2, which makes 70 % of preoperative facial dysfunction in small and medium-size tumors.The surgical outcome was outstanding, with unchanged postoperative facial function (with the exception of the case with preoperative radiotherapy), only one case experiencing a hearing loss from AAORLHNS class B to C, and no instances of deafness. The removal of tumors from the internal auditory canal without a drill meatotomy in this series might have been favoured by a limited extension into the canal. The results on the hearing and facial nerve are superior to the results reported in the literature.We dare to say that we never had a group of ten consecutive cases with only one postop limited hearing loss in over 300 cases of hearing preservation surgery on smaller tumors [8].This revived approach, which was already dismissed by experienced surgeons, although now implemented by endoscopic assistance needs further validation in order to assess its performance versus the standard retrosigmoid approach.Notwithstanding, Iacoangeli and his colleagues have further contributed to the debate upon the treatment of acoustic neuroma. This has indeed been an active dispute over the last decades, and is nowadays even keener thanks to the further inputs brought by neurosurgeons, otosurgeons, endoscopists, and, last but not least, radiotherapists.It should be considered that early diagnosis results in a patient's population mainly (in 70 % of cases, according to accredited studies) made up of small tumors: the current debate and renewal of treatment options is therefore nowadays addressed to such lesions.