Surgical trainee research collaboratives in the UK: an observational study of research activity and publication productivity

Abstract

ObjectivesTo analyse the research activity and publication output of surgical trainee research collaboratives in the UK.SettingSurgical trainee research collaboratives in the UK.ParticipantsA total of 24 collaboratives were included in this study from 33 identified organisations. We excluded one group that focused purely on systematic review of the literature and eight groups for which we could not identify suitable data sources (website or trainee committee contact).Primary and secondary outcomePrimary data-points were identified for each collaborative including surgical subspeciality, numbers and types of projects. For published articles, secondary outcomes including study population size, journal impact factor, number of citations and evidence level were collected.ResultsA total of 24 collaboratives met our inclusion criteria with a portfolio of 80 projects. The project types included audit (46%), randomised clinical trial (16%), surveys (16%), cohort studies (10%), systematic reviews (2.5%) and other or unidentifiable (9.5%). A total of 35 publications were identified of which just over half (54%) were original research articles. The median size of studied population was 540 patients with a range from 108 to 3138. The published works provided a varied compilation of evidence levels ranging from 1b (individual RCT) to 5 (expert opinion) with a median level of 2b (individual cohort study). The West Midlands Research Collaborative had the highest number of publications (13), citations (130) and h-index (5).ConclusionsThe experience of UK-based trainee research collaboratives provides useful insights for trainees and policymakers in global healthcare systems on the value and feasibility of trainee-driven high quality surgical research.

Management of pinna haematoma study (MaPHaeS): A multicentre retrospective observational study

“…Collaborative data submission allowed the rapid collection of a significant volume of data across multiple sites, despite the relative infrequency of cases presenting to any one hospital. Regional and national trainee collaboratives have demonstrated significant potential for the delivery of research and audit projects where data collection at a single or small number of sites would be inadequate . It also has the added benefits for trainees in terms of experience and training.…”

“…Regional and national trainee collaboratives have demonstrated significant potential for the delivery of research and audit projects where data collection at a single or small number of sites would be inadequate. 9 It also has the added benefits for trainees in terms of experience and training.…”

Who, where, what and where to now? A snapshot of publishing patterns in Australian orthopaedic surgery

“…More importantly, collaboration on the conceptualization of multiple studies would be a valuable strategy to increase research quality, productivity and subsequently researcher capability, all within the constraints of their allotted time frame. The ‘trainee collaboratives’ in the UK have reported success in this regard . Key intentions behind these collaboratives that are translatable to other contexts, including Australian orthopaedic surgery research, are captured in the following insights: ‘Trainees are ideally placed to deliver this model; they follow a rotational pattern through several hospitals, are in regular contact with each other, are motivated and require formalized evidence of research and audit.…”

Comment on: ‘One-year real-world outcomes in patients receiving fixed-dosing aflibercept for neovascular age-related macular degeneration’

“…Thank you for your interest in our article published in Eye. 1 The aim of our work 1 was to report real-world outcomes using Aflibercept in treatment-naive eyes with nAMD per the available evidence (VIEW 1&2).…”