2021
DOI: 10.1080/2000656x.2021.1873794
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surgical techniques for repair of abdominal rectus diastasis: a scoping review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, the sufficiency of plicating is questioned. Jessen et al 20 performed a review of 61 studies with 3531 included patients and found a long-term recurrence rate of RD after surgery between 0% and 40%. Different plication techniques were compared but did not give a statistical significance favoring one method.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, the sufficiency of plicating is questioned. Jessen et al 20 performed a review of 61 studies with 3531 included patients and found a long-term recurrence rate of RD after surgery between 0% and 40%. Different plication techniques were compared but did not give a statistical significance favoring one method.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, these studies all implicate that plicating an RD can be useful. [20][21][22][23] Because we found that preoperative RD significantly increases risk of bulging, we now plicate all RDs wider than 2 cm in the UMCU. A prospective trial needs to be performed to further investigate if plicating can indeed significantly decrease the risk of abdominal bulging.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Plication of RD is an established component of the abdominoplasty procedure performed mainly for a cosmetic reason. In recent decades, abdominal wall surgeons have presented repair techniques with or without mesh reinforcement 30 , 31 , different open approaches 19 , 32 , and a variety of endo-laparoscopic methods as an alternative to open repairs such as endoscopic-assisted linea alba repair (ELAR), subcutaneous onlay laparoscopic approach (SCOLA), preaponeurotic endoscopic repair (REPA), total endoscopic-assisted linea alba reconstruction (TESLAR) and the robotic transabdominal retromuscular rectus diastasis (r-TARRD) repair 33–38 . Both open and endo-laparoscopic repairs have shown to be safe and effective 39 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several training methods have been described [ 11 ] that seem to increase core strength and stability but fail to significantly reduce the diastasis [ 12 , 13 ]. Positive results after surgical reconstruction of rectus diastasis has been reported in multiple studies [ 14 ]. A repair of the rectus diastasis is a common component in abdominoplasty, primarily performed for cosmetic reasons [ 15 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous different surgical techniques for rectus diastasis repair have been described during the last decade, open as well as laparoscopic, with mesh reinforcement as well as suture repair [ 16 , 17 ]. The various surgical methods reported in the literature have been evaluated regarding recurrences and postoperative complications [ 14 ]. There is, however, a paucity of patient-reported outcomes regarding functional improvements, such as back pain, core stability, abdominal muscle strength, urinary incontinence as well as quality of life.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%