2010
DOI: 10.1097/ico.0b013e3181e2ef9c
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surgical Technique of Deep Anterior Lamellar Keratoplasty in Descemetoceles

Abstract: Viscoelastic-assisted DALK is a useful therapeutic option in selected cases of descemetocele after resolved microbial keratitis.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
6
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These component customized surgeries[5678] dedicated to different layers of the cornea have lesser complications as compared to open-sky procedures, hence are gaining popularity with the advancing technology.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These component customized surgeries[5678] dedicated to different layers of the cornea have lesser complications as compared to open-sky procedures, hence are gaining popularity with the advancing technology.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DALK can be used to treat descemetocele if PDL is detected on OCT. Various studies have been published that denote the existence of descemetocele in cases of corneal melting and measures to prevent the eye from perforation,[ 6 7 8 ] but to the best of our knowledge, none of these studies have incorporated the application of OCT to assess the thickness of the residual corneal tissue that resists perforation. Although histopathology and electron microscopy are essential for documentation, it could not be performed for case 1 as DALK procedure was performed to reinforce the corneal integrity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For DALK, viscoelastic-assisted dissection, previously described by us, was undertaken. [ 12 ] During keratoplasties performed for eyes with active infiltrates, an extra 0.25 mm margin was excised, and the host–donor disparity was maintained between 0.5 and 1 mm.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%