2011
DOI: 10.5180/jsgoe.27.272
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surgical technique and usefulness of Retrograde approach to patients with unclear uterine cevixes and with severe adhesion in a cul-de-sac.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 8 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition to the methods devised by our department, the usefulness of placing an upper abdominal port, preceding enucleating myomectomy, and the use of an electric morcellator for the treatment of large uterine myomas has been previously reported ( 5 ), as has the usefulness of retrograde TLH for the treatment of advanced adhesions and cases with an unclear cervical region ( 6 , 7 ). Regarding large myomas of the uterus, TLH is applicable even for uterine myomas weighing >1,000 g. It has been reported that the rate of switch to laparotomy was 4.2–9.7%, a small incision in the abdominal wall was necessary to extract the specimen in 21% of the cases, and the incidence of complications was 2.8–11.4% ( 3 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to the methods devised by our department, the usefulness of placing an upper abdominal port, preceding enucleating myomectomy, and the use of an electric morcellator for the treatment of large uterine myomas has been previously reported ( 5 ), as has the usefulness of retrograde TLH for the treatment of advanced adhesions and cases with an unclear cervical region ( 6 , 7 ). Regarding large myomas of the uterus, TLH is applicable even for uterine myomas weighing >1,000 g. It has been reported that the rate of switch to laparotomy was 4.2–9.7%, a small incision in the abdominal wall was necessary to extract the specimen in 21% of the cases, and the incidence of complications was 2.8–11.4% ( 3 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%