2021
DOI: 10.1017/ash.2021.176
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surgical site infection metrics: Dissecting the differences between the National Health and Safety Network and the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program

Abstract: Surgical site infections (SSIs) are associated with readmissions, reoperations, increased cost of care, and overall morbidity and mortality risk. The National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) and the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) have developed an array of metrics to monitor hospital-acquired complications. The only metric collected by both is SSI, but performance as benchmarked against peer hospitals is often discordant between the 2 systems. In this commentary, we outline the differen… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Using this novel mechanism and leveraging collaboration between multiple professional societies, a large, conclusive randomized clinical trial was conducted. The backbone of this study design was the robust and well-validated ACS-NSQIP, which is built on structured review of clinical events by trained clinical reviewers using rigorous definitions . Data in ACS-NSQIP are abstracted in a manner similar to traditional clinical trial variables, with a trained reviewer performing detailed encounter assessments and asking participating clinicians for input in the event that unclear diagnoses are encountered.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using this novel mechanism and leveraging collaboration between multiple professional societies, a large, conclusive randomized clinical trial was conducted. The backbone of this study design was the robust and well-validated ACS-NSQIP, which is built on structured review of clinical events by trained clinical reviewers using rigorous definitions . Data in ACS-NSQIP are abstracted in a manner similar to traditional clinical trial variables, with a trained reviewer performing detailed encounter assessments and asking participating clinicians for input in the event that unclear diagnoses are encountered.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These systems often rely on self-reporting of SSI from hospitals and healthcare systems and have limited postoperative periods (30–90 days, depending on procedures). 18 In our study, we focused on individual diagnoses, observed both in the inpatient and outpatient settings, with the objective of capturing all infections, including those that may have been treated beyond 90 days. Therefore, compared to reporting from NSQIP or NHSN or similar systems, our study may have included a larger number of infection events.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The diagnosis of SSI is often made based on physical examination alone, and without objective culture results. Furthermore, the definition of SSI varies depending on the source, as illustrated by the definitional differences for SSI provided by the National Healthcare Central Network and the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (Christensen et al., 2021). We chose to use the NSQIP definition for SSI because it is straightforward, widely accepted and the presence of SSI is meant to be determined by retrospective medical record review.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%