2009
DOI: 10.1245/s10434-009-0678-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surgical Resection Versus Laparoscopic Radiofrequency Ablation in Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Child-Pugh Class A Liver Cirrhosis

Abstract: Our data were obtained from a large number of HCC cases and support similar survival rates after HR or LRFA for single HCC nodules on Child-Pugh class A liver cirrhosis, despite a marked increase in HCC recurrence rates after LRFA.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
60
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
4
60
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In some studies RFA was used in combination with surgery for disease that was otherwise not treatable by resection alone. 45,46,64,65 , whereas those in the resection group were 0-10 per cent 45,46,56,62,64 and 33-51 per cent 45,46,64,65 . None of the eight studies showed significant differences in overall survival rates between the RFA and resection groups.…”
Section: Outcomes After Radiofrequency Ablation For Unresectable Hepamentioning
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In some studies RFA was used in combination with surgery for disease that was otherwise not treatable by resection alone. 45,46,64,65 , whereas those in the resection group were 0-10 per cent 45,46,56,62,64 and 33-51 per cent 45,46,64,65 . None of the eight studies showed significant differences in overall survival rates between the RFA and resection groups.…”
Section: Outcomes After Radiofrequency Ablation For Unresectable Hepamentioning
confidence: 86%
“…None of the eight studies showed significant differences in overall survival rates between the RFA and resection groups. However, patients treated with resection had significantly lower local recurrence rates 46,56,64 , and higher disease-free survival rates 62,65 . Survival rates were rounded to the nearest figure.…”
Section: Outcomes After Radiofrequency Ablation For Unresectable Hepamentioning
confidence: 98%
“…LLR has become a good option for the treatment of HCC. However, LLR for cirrhotic patients is still not widely adopted [13,14]. Many reports have suggested that LLR for small HCC is associated with similar or reduced morbidity in cirrhotic patients compared with an open resection [15,16,17].…”
Section: Indicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many reports have suggested that LLR for small HCC is associated with similar or reduced morbidity in cirrhotic patients compared with an open resection [15,16,17]. There may be an advantage of LLR over open liver resection in that the former does not interrupt the collateral vessels on the abdominal wall [14]. Laparoscopic resection of hepatocellular cancers in a cirrhotic liver is feasible and safe in experienced centers, and follow-up data from a few study groups have suggested that the long-term oncologic outcome has not been compromised by the laparoscopic approach compared with open resection [2,4,8,18,19].…”
Section: Indicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, as many as 50-70% of patients who initially undergo HR or thermal ablation (TA) for HCC will experience a recurrence in the remnant liver within 5 years [3][4][5]. To date, salvage HR has been the preferred treatment for intrahepatic recurrence, resulting in further prolongation of survival [5,6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%