2021
DOI: 10.1007/s00192-021-04680-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surgical Repair of the Genital Hiatus: A Narrative Review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
11
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
2
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Vaughan et al [18] found that the failure rate of complex anatomy in patients with GH ≥ 4 cm was 15.8 times higher than in patients with GH < 4 cm 6 weeks after vaginal apical suspension. Kikuchi et al [19] proposed in the review of laceration and repair that increased laceration was a high-risk factor for primary prolapse and postoperative recurrence.…”
Section: Applied Bionics and Biomechanicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Vaughan et al [18] found that the failure rate of complex anatomy in patients with GH ≥ 4 cm was 15.8 times higher than in patients with GH < 4 cm 6 weeks after vaginal apical suspension. Kikuchi et al [19] proposed in the review of laceration and repair that increased laceration was a high-risk factor for primary prolapse and postoperative recurrence.…”
Section: Applied Bionics and Biomechanicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…33 This theory is also supported by previously published work. 14,34 Furthermore, recent studies suggest a strong association between genital hiatus size and prolapse; however, there are limited data on the specific risks of perineal reconstruction concerning other symptoms of pelvic floor dysfunction. 17,35 The findings of the present study are consistent with published data on the benefits of reconstructing the perineal body.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…17,35 The findings of the present study are consistent with published data on the benefits of reconstructing the perineal body. 14,34,36 Bergman et al showed an improvement in patient satisfaction after perineal reconstructive surgery when compared with physiotherapy. 12 Correspondingly, in this study, the total postoperative scores were greatly reduced, and the item score "Are you experiencing genital discomfort that affects your quality of life?"…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In women complaining of a “widened vagina” sensation, there is some evidence that perineorrhaphy, a level 3 NTR technique, may provide high patient satisfaction rate and few complications 84 . Genital hiatus surgery should be carefully considered at the time of POP surgery, and surgeons should discuss with their patients potential risks and benefits of perineorrhaphy 85 …”
Section: Safety and Efficacy Evidence On Ntr According To Vaginal Seg...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…84 Genital hiatus surgery should be carefully considered at the time of POP surgery, and surgeons should discuss with their patients potential risks and benefits of perineorrhaphy. 85…”
Section: Level 3-repair Of a Wide Genital Hiatusmentioning
confidence: 99%