2019
DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.15894
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surgical removal of superficial peritoneal endometriosis for managing women with chronic pelvic pain: time for a rethink?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
48
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
(22 reference statements)
1
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We have read the commentary by Horne et al 1 and agree with the authors: placebocontrolled surgical trials for superficial peritoneal endometriosis (SPE) are needed. Such designs are the gold standard of testing treatment efficacy for chronic pain 2 and without placebo-control, it is ultimately unknown whether women with SPE are subjected to repeated surgeries that are not only unnecessary but also potentially harmful.…”
Section: Sirmentioning
confidence: 57%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We have read the commentary by Horne et al 1 and agree with the authors: placebocontrolled surgical trials for superficial peritoneal endometriosis (SPE) are needed. Such designs are the gold standard of testing treatment efficacy for chronic pain 2 and without placebo-control, it is ultimately unknown whether women with SPE are subjected to repeated surgeries that are not only unnecessary but also potentially harmful.…”
Section: Sirmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…First, when there is genuine doubt about the effect of a standard treatment (such as surgery for SPE, as described by Horne et al 1 ), placebo-controlled designs are needed to ascertain whether the treatment is effective. 2 For women with SPE, the placebo arm can be operationalised as a diagnostic laparoscopy without histology.…”
Section: Sirmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, we want to stand in support of the arguments put forth by Horne et al 1 Second, we would like to supplement the commentary with two additional suggestions. First, we want to stand in support of the arguments put forth by Horne et al 1 Second, we would like to supplement the commentary with two additional suggestions.…”
Section: Sirmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The aim of our letter is two-fold. First, we want to stand in support of the arguments put forth by Horne et al 1 Second, we would like to supplement the commentary with two additional suggestions. In both clinical practice and future clinical trials, we believe that clinicians should: (1) adopt a greater focus on the subtyping of endometriosis with imaging to improve preoperative planning; and (2) standardise the evaluation of various pain aetiologies that may complicate the response to the surgical treatment of SPE.…”
Section: Sirmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation