1998
DOI: 10.1097/00000539-199802001-00047
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surgical Procedure Times Are Well Modeled by the Lognormal Distribution

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Year Published

1999
1999
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The first direction is fitting the data to a known distribution, such as normal 22,23 or log-normal. [24][25][26][27] While studies show that such models can produce accurate predictions and increase operating room efficiency, 27 they did not offer insight into the factors that may impact the predictions. Therefore, we chose to focus on the second direction, which uses statistical and machine learning models to identify important features and produce predictions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first direction is fitting the data to a known distribution, such as normal 22,23 or log-normal. [24][25][26][27] While studies show that such models can produce accurate predictions and increase operating room efficiency, 27 they did not offer insight into the factors that may impact the predictions. Therefore, we chose to focus on the second direction, which uses statistical and machine learning models to identify important features and produce predictions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is common to assume that surgical durations are lognormally distributed [6][7][8] . Here, it is shown that this assumption is questionable in approximately half of the specialties at a large Australian public hospital.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, we used surgery time distributions estimated through data collected by Torres (2007) for the HUCFF. Based on the recommendation by Strum, May, and Vargas (1998), we used log-normal statistical distributions. These distributions were compared to the mentioned data and passed Kolmogorov-Smirnov tests.…”
Section: Simulation Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%