2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2019.10.754
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surgical outcomes and prognostic factors for survival for colorectal liver metastases: a 10-years single center experience

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4) showed no difference in overall survival in patients with synchronous ( n = 6) or metachronous ( n = 7) CRLM (Log‐Rank test p = 0,730). These results were compared with the overall survival of patient with liver resection for colorectal metastases in our centre–48.28 months for metachronous lesions and 46.5 months for synchronous lesions [24]. These results imply that IVC‐involvement is poor prognostic factor, but definitive conclusions cannot be made at this point.…”
Section: Survivalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4) showed no difference in overall survival in patients with synchronous ( n = 6) or metachronous ( n = 7) CRLM (Log‐Rank test p = 0,730). These results were compared with the overall survival of patient with liver resection for colorectal metastases in our centre–48.28 months for metachronous lesions and 46.5 months for synchronous lesions [24]. These results imply that IVC‐involvement is poor prognostic factor, but definitive conclusions cannot be made at this point.…”
Section: Survivalmentioning
confidence: 99%