1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0190-9622(18)30743-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surgical margins for excision of primary cutaneous melanoma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
56
0
5

Year Published

2000
2000
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
2
56
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…6,15,25,[33][34][35]38,40,48 Mounting evidence supports the concept that while margins for trunk and extremity invasive melanoma may be narrowed without reducing survival, 9,18,19 MIS, especially on the head and neck, may need even wider margins than previously thought. 6,15,25,[33][34][35]38,40,48 Mounting evidence supports the concept that while margins for trunk and extremity invasive melanoma may be narrowed without reducing survival, 9,18,19 MIS, especially on the head and neck, may need even wider margins than previously thought.…”
Section: Case Report and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…6,15,25,[33][34][35]38,40,48 Mounting evidence supports the concept that while margins for trunk and extremity invasive melanoma may be narrowed without reducing survival, 9,18,19 MIS, especially on the head and neck, may need even wider margins than previously thought. 6,15,25,[33][34][35]38,40,48 Mounting evidence supports the concept that while margins for trunk and extremity invasive melanoma may be narrowed without reducing survival, 9,18,19 MIS, especially on the head and neck, may need even wider margins than previously thought.…”
Section: Case Report and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…[1][2][3][4][5][6] A dynamic trend toward reducing the size of resection margins continues, buoyed by evidence that extensive surgery aimed at removing subclinical satellite micrometastases beyond the primary contiguous tumor mass neither reduces recurrences, [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15] nor affords a survival advantage. Excisional surgery remains the standard of care for local cutaneous stage 1 and stage 2 MM and for MIS.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…26 Subsequently others have reported their success utilizing the fresh tissue technique, [27][28][29] but it is difficult to know if unnecessarily larger margins are performed in this setting compared to our approach. 26 Subsequently others have reported their success utilizing the fresh tissue technique, [27][28][29] but it is difficult to know if unnecessarily larger margins are performed in this setting compared to our approach.…”
Section: Malignant Melanomamentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Mohs surgery has been used to establish guidelines for excision margins for recurrent cutaneous melanoma. 11,12 We conducted a systematic review of all randomized controlled trials that have examined the resection margins for cutaneous melanoma comparing narrow margins with wide excision margins. This was done to assess the effect of width of excision margin on melanoma recurrences, disease-free survival, and overall survival.…”
Section: Original Articlementioning
confidence: 99%
“…12 The results of the United Kingdom Melanoma Study Group excision trial, which compares 1-cm vs 3-cm margins of excision in patients with melanoma 2 mm or thicker, are awaited.…”
Section: Disease-free Survivalmentioning
confidence: 99%