“…We would agree that 'pericardiostomy is advisable in those patients in whom recurrent cardiac tamponade develops in spite of repeated aspirations and in those in whom the fluid is thick or aspirated with difficulty' (Benzing and Kaplan, 1963). Different surgical approaches to drainage have recently been reviewed (Cameron, 1975). However, pericardiostomy is not without complications (Boyle et al, 1961), and the statement made in 1941 that 'needle aspiration almost uniformly fails to save the patient' (Adams and Polderman, 1941) is no longer true.…”