2000
DOI: 10.1016/s1072-7515(00)00734-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surgical Management of Rectourinary Fistulae

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although RUF healing can occur spontaneously, surgical intervention is often required [17]. Numerous surgical techniques have been described including transabdominal, transanal, transperineal, combined abdominoperineal, anterior and posterior transsphincteric, transsacral, and endoscopic minimally invasive approaches [1,2,4,[18][19][20][21][22][23][24]. Due to rarity of RUF, the heterogeneity of fistula etiology and morphology in addition to the various procedures available to treat it, a standardized approach to the management of this condition is lacking.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although RUF healing can occur spontaneously, surgical intervention is often required [17]. Numerous surgical techniques have been described including transabdominal, transanal, transperineal, combined abdominoperineal, anterior and posterior transsphincteric, transsacral, and endoscopic minimally invasive approaches [1,2,4,[18][19][20][21][22][23][24]. Due to rarity of RUF, the heterogeneity of fistula etiology and morphology in addition to the various procedures available to treat it, a standardized approach to the management of this condition is lacking.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Obvious advantages like limited postoperative morbidity, absence of skin incision, preservation of continence, and short operating time distinguish this technique from standard approach and probably outweigh limited instrument manoeuvrability, lack of interposed tissue, and poor visibility [15]. Especially after prostate removal, this access convinces because of a reduced distance between the fistula and anus [2]. Nevertheless, we think that limited instrument manoeuvrability gains in importance most notably in case of biomesh implantation, and therefore, reproducibility could only be ensured in experienced hands.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For radiated cases, gracilis muscle interposition may be preferred. Although surgical repair remains the gold standard, there is still no consensus concerning the management of RUF with no data available clearly favoring one approach [2,3]. Therefore, it is mandatory to look for innovative, minimally invasive procedures using biomaterials.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It may not be feasible in patients who have undergone previous abdominal surgeries. Transposition of the gracilis muscle as a viable flap provides a well-vascularised muscle rotation flap, thereby avoiding the need for laparotomy [16]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%