2023
DOI: 10.2106/jbjs.rvw.22.00232
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surgical Management of Metastatic Pathologic Subtrochanteric Fractures

Abstract: Background:Subtrochanteric pathological fractures (PFs) occur in approximately one-third of femur bone metastases. We seek to analyze surgical treatment strategies for subtrochanteric metastatic PFs and their revision rates.Methods:A systematic review was performed using the PubMed and Ovid databases. Reoperations as a result of complications were analyzed according to initial treatment modality, primary tumor site, and type of revision procedure.Results:We identified a total of 544 patients, 405 with PFs and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We chose to use this assessment tool due to the observational nature of all studies included. Ten of the 22 items of the STROBE checklist were used, as reported in the previous literature 22-25 . Well-described items in the checklist received a score of 2 points, partly described items 1 point, and poorly described ones 0 points.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We chose to use this assessment tool due to the observational nature of all studies included. Ten of the 22 items of the STROBE checklist were used, as reported in the previous literature 22-25 . Well-described items in the checklist received a score of 2 points, partly described items 1 point, and poorly described ones 0 points.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We assessed the quality of the included studies using the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) checklist field. Ten of the 22 items of the STROBE checklist were used in accordance with previous studies in the orthopaedic literature [116][117][118][119][120] . Each item was graded on a scale of 0 to 2, with 2 points being used in well-described items, 1 point in partly described items, and 0 points in poorly described items.…”
Section: Assessment Of Study Qualitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ten of the 22 items of the STROBE checklist were used as reported in previous orthopaedic literature. 3,11,12,16 Each item was graded on a scale of 0-2, with 2 points being used in well-described items, 1 point in partly described items, and 0 points in poorly described items. Studies with a cumulative score equal to or higher than 15 points were included.…”
Section: Assessment Of Study Qualitymentioning
confidence: 99%