1995
DOI: 10.1016/s0741-5214(05)80009-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surgical management of infrainguinal arterial prosthetic graft infections: Review of a thirty-five-year experience

Abstract: IAPGI is associated with substantial early mortality and amputation rates. Complete excision of infected graft material results in a significant reduction in the incidence of recurrent sepsis.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
63
0
2

Year Published

1998
1998
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 106 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
63
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In a large historical series, the reported rates for postoperative amputation and mortality were 40 and 18 %, respectively [ 40 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a large historical series, the reported rates for postoperative amputation and mortality were 40 and 18 %, respectively [ 40 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patients in this series required arterial reconstruction to preserve limb viability and none had available or suitable GSV to perform a complete lower-limb arterial reconstruction. We embarked on a refrigerated stored homograft replacement program because the homografts harvested from deceased donors may be available as part of an active, local multiorgan transplant retrieval program and we were dissatisfied with the more conventional treatments in terms of mortality, reinfection, and amputation rates [3] . The results demonstrate that cold-stored refrigerated homograft reconstruction is applicable in the management of serious graft infection, even for emergency use, and the results suggest that vein homografts have a good resistance to infection as well.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The goal of therapy is infection eradication and maintenance of adequate perfusion. Radical excision of infected perigraft tissue is recommended and mandatory in cases of sepsis, anastomotic disruption or graft occlusion [1][2][3] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…4,5 In cases involving systemic infection, bypass removal is mandatory, often in association with amputation or bypass using a different pathway and anastomotic sites. 4,6 In cases involving localized infection of the distal anastomosis, the same solutions may be adopted but other options are available, including rerouting the bypass to another patent artery and conservative treatment. 2,5,[7][8][9][10] Conservative treatment is the more likely choice since there is rarely another artery suitable for re-anastomosis and, if there is, hemodynamic results are generally less favorable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%