1999
DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.4-2-95
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surgical Management of Esophageal Carcinoma

Abstract: Surgical management of esophageal carcinoma is reviewed. The anatomy and biology are briefly mentioned, since these factors mitigate against the success of surgery. Staging, the key to proper treatment allocation and prognosis, is discussed, including the use of endoscopic ultrasonography, positron emission tomography, and thoracoscopy/laparoscopy. Patient selection and preparation for surgery are important considerations. Surgical techniques are then discussed, as are the advantages and disadvantages of vario… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
3

Year Published

2002
2002
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
10
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, surgical mortality for esophageal resection reported in the literature in the last decade is around 10% and 5%. 17…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, surgical mortality for esophageal resection reported in the literature in the last decade is around 10% and 5%. 17…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 After complete surgical removal of the tumor, the five-year survival rate exceeds 95 percent for stage 0 disease, and is 50 to 80 percent for stage I disease, 30 to 40 percent for stage IIA disease, 10 to 30 percent for stage IIB disease, and 10 to 15 percent for stage III disease. [76][77][78] Patients with metastatic (stage IV) disease who are treated with palliative chemotherapy have a median survival of less than one year. 80 In addition to the TNM stage, multivariate analyses suggest that a weight loss of more than 10 percent of body mass, dysphagia, large tumors, advanced age, and lymphatic micrometastases (identified by immunohistochemical analysis) are independent predictors of a poor prognosis.…”
Section: Staging and Prognosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this group of patients with locally advanced EC, surgery alone is not a standard treatment due to difficulties on achieving complete resection and poor results. Between 30 to 50% of cases do not achieve complete tumor resection (R0), and even after R0 surgery, relapse (local or metastatic) is common, with long-term survival around 20% (7). This fact prompted clinical research in locally advanced EC with major evolution in the last 15 years.…”
Section: 2locally Advanced Ecmentioning
confidence: 99%