Over the past decade, incredible advances in the field of global surgery have been made. In 2015, The Lancet Commission on Global Surgery report highlighted the significant unmet need for safe and affordable surgical care for the world's people. 1 In the same year, the authors of the third edition of Disease Control Priorities in Developing Countries outlined a plan for capacity building for essential surgery, 2 while the 68th World Health Assembly passed a resolution to strengthen emergency and essential surgical and anesthesia care as a component of universal health coverage. 3 Today, we recognize that the provision of safe and effective surgical care is necessary to meet the Sustainable Development Goals 4 by 2030. This is an exciting time to be part of the field of global surgery as we strive to achieve equity in the provision of surgical care for all. 5 Pediatric surgical conditions account for an important, yet often underrecognized, portion of the global surgical disease burden. Concepcion and colleagues 6 assessed 1503 children for surgical conditions using the Surgeons OverSeas Assessment of Surgical Need (SOSAS) survey. In this crosssectional study using a national community-based sampling survey, the authors found a pediatric surgical condition prevalence of 12.2%, with just 23.7% of these cases treated by surgery. The most common conditions found among children in Somaliland were congenital anomalies (33.8%) and wounds secondary to injury (24.6%). The findings of this study echo previous investigations of pediatric surgical disease burden in other low-and middle-income countries (LMICs), 7-9 and this article represents a significant addition to the literature on the global burden of surgical disease. For policy makers, the study results provide an important reminder that specific provisions for the surgical care of children must be part of any national surgical, obstetric, and anesthesia plan going forward.While this study was well designed and executed, the use of the SOSAS tool as administered by nonphysician surveyors introduces limitations in the utility of its results. First, the SOSAS tool does not provide information about surgical conditions that is granular enough to identify resources needed to address the conditions identified. For example, a wound secondary to injury if superficial could be repaired by an associate clinician, while a deep laceration with associated orthopedic or vascular injury would likely require a surgical specialist for optimal care. Similarly, a burn that is partial thickness involving a small body surface area may just need local wound care, while a large fullthickness burn that does not receive timely resuscitation, excision, and skin grafting could result in infection, contracture, and permanent disability or death. Because the SOSAS tool does not assess the level of disability caused by each surgical condition found, the implications of the disease prevalence demonstrated by the survey for population health are unclear.This study by Concepcion and colleagues 6 rep...