“…The measurement methods were diverse and thus were categorised for comparison by separating them into those that measured stiffness via practitioner palpation and judgment (n = 13, Table 1) and those that used instrumentation (n = 62), and further subdividing instrumented measurement methods into three types. The instrumented studies were categorised into those that measured accessory movement at a particular spinal level (n = 42, Table 2), those that measured physiological movement of the spine with or without measurement of muscle activity (n = 13) (Brown et al, 2006;Brown and McGill, 2008Cholewicki et al, 1999Cholewicki et al, , 2000Drake et al, 2008;Essendrop et al, 2002;Gombatto et al, 2008a,b;Green et al, 2002;Hodges et al, 2009;Lee et al, 2006), and those that measured stiffness intraoperatively (n = 7) (Ambrosetti-Giudici et al, 2009;Brown et al, 2002a;Ebara et al, 1992;Hasegawa et al, 2008;Krenn et al, 2008;Nathan and Keller, 1994;Takano et al, 2006). Thirty-seven of these studies addressed factors that affect the instrumented measurement of spinal stiffness (Table 3), with 9 including participants with spinal pain and 28 including asymptomatic participants.…”