2006
DOI: 10.1038/sj.bdj.4813947
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surgical guidelines for dental implant placement

Abstract: The goal of an implant supported reconstruction is to obtain optimal aesthetics and function. In order to achieve this, visualisation of the final restorative reconstruction is necessary prior to beginning treatment. The term 'restorative-driven' treatment planning has been used to identify this process. 1 It requires a team approach of specialists, who can develop a multidisciplinary treatment plan. It starts with an accurate diagnosis, which will lead to a prognosis of each individual tooth and the overall d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
20
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Maxillary cement-retained and mandibular screw-retained implant restorations were prescribed esthetics (labial placed implant necks) and retrievability, respectively. [42]…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Maxillary cement-retained and mandibular screw-retained implant restorations were prescribed esthetics (labial placed implant necks) and retrievability, respectively. [42]…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Implant placement without surgical template leads to loss of control of exact implant positioning and would lead to esthetic failure. 11 Buccolingual angulations of the implant in nonesthetic zone in not as crucial as mesiodistal spacing in achieving an adequate teeth form and interproximal spacing. …”
Section: Esthetic Zonementioning
confidence: 99%
“…16,21 Other publications may have used the term "consensus" in their titles or within the text but gave no evidence of how consensus was achieved; in these cases, it was assumed that "consensus" was being used synonymously with "agreement" rather than indicating the use of a defined methodology. All other publications were classified as expert opinion, although there was great variation in the number and nature of the "experts" involved, ranging from a single author publication 24 to extensive and multidisciplinary panels. 15,37 The results of the quality assessment using the AGREE II instrument are shown in Table 4.…”
Section: Domainmentioning
confidence: 99%