Background:Concern surrounding the effect of resident fatigue on patient care recently led the National Steering Committee on Resident Duty Hours to publish Canadian recommendations suggesting that duty periods of 24 or more consecutive hours without restorative sleep should be avoided. We sought to characterize how different training programs are preparing for the effect of such changes on education, patient care and provider well-being.
Methods:Using constructivist grounded theory methodology, we conducted 18 one-on-one semistructured interviews with program directors, division directors and department chiefs from 11 residency programs affiliated with one Canadian medical school. We gathered and analyzed data iteratively until we reached theoretical saturation.
Results:The key theme articulated by our participants was that changes in resident duty hours would potentially lead to gaps in the provision of clinical care. These changes affect acute care specialties based primarily in the inpatient setting (e.g., medicine, surgery) more than primarily ambulatory (e.g., family medicine) or shift-model based (e.g., emergency) specialties. Potential strategies to address gaps in clinical care include resident-based solutions, faculty-based solutions and solutions based on other providers (e.g., nonacademic physicians, physician extenders). Each solution has unique advantages and disadvantages in terms of education, continuity of care, preparedness for practice and provider well-being.Interpretation: Our data-driven framework serves as a guide for programs to anticipate challenges of satisfying clinical care needs in the face of changes to resident duty hours, while balancing education, care continuity, preparedness for practice and provider wellbeing. Our findings challenge the "one-size-fits-all" approach to changes to resident duty hours and endorse flexibility in enacting duty hour regulations based on specialty-specific factors.
AbstractSee CMAJ: editorial, www.cmaj.ca/lookup/doi/10.1503/cmaj140588; and analysis, www.cmaj.ca/lookup/doi/10.1503/cmaj.131053
E116
CMAJ OPEN, 2(2)Research CMAJ OPEN most of the studies used surveys to assess the perceptions of trainees and faculty; these surveys often provide insufficient detail to explore and characterize the nuanced effect of reducing resident duty hours and the interplay of the factors affected by these reductions. As a result, it is difficult to predict how all of the factors relate to one another, leaving program directors with the challenge of applying a generic understanding of the various effects of reductions of resident duty hours to their specific training contexts. To help program directors anticipate these problems and proactively identify solutions, we aimed to explore the perceived effect of changes to resident duty hours from the perspective of program directors, division directors and department chiefs, and to explore how they planned to address changes in resident duty hours.
MethodsWe used constructivist grounded theory, a qualitative methodology that...