2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2016.09.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surgical embryo collection but not nonsurgical embryo transfer compromises postintervention prolificacy in sows

Abstract: Surgical embryo collection but not nonsurgical embryo transfer compromises postintervention prolificacy in sows, Theriogenology, 2017. 87, pp.316-320. http

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Embryos were retrieved on Day 6 from inseminated sows as previously reported [3]. Sedation and general anesthesia were achieved by azaperone (i.m.…”
Section: Embryo Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Embryos were retrieved on Day 6 from inseminated sows as previously reported [3]. Sedation and general anesthesia were achieved by azaperone (i.m.…”
Section: Embryo Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite these important advantages, the use of ET in pigs has not reached the levels attained in other domestic animals, such as cattle. Although the main drawback for a broad application of ET in pigs comes from the necessity of using surgical methods to retrieve embryos, a lower litter size is also a determinant for its limited use [2,3]. Approximately 55% of transferred embryos die before, during, or shortly after implantation in the reproductive tract of recipients after ET, values almost 25 percentage points higher than those obtained by artificial insemination (AI) [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A usual concern of genetic and production companies is the impact that surgical embryo collection and NsDU‐ET procedures have on the future reproductive performance of the donors and recipients, respectively, which previous studies never examined. Recently, we evaluated the reproductive performance of donors and recipients after AI subsequent to surgical embryo collection and NsDU‐ET procedures, respectively (Martinez et al., ). We found that while the farrowing rate of donors was not affected by surgery, prolificacy was deeply reduced (two piglets less).…”
Section: Factors Affecting the Et Technologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For embryo recovery, the reproductive tract was exposed via mid-line incision, corpora lutea were counted on the ovaries, and the embryos were collected as previously reported (19). Briefly, a small incision in the uterine wall 30-40 cm below the uterotubal junction was performed with a blunt Adson forcep, and then, a glass cannula was inserted through the incision.…”
Section: Embryo and Tissue Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%