2005
DOI: 10.1157/13074137
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surgical (close lateral internal sphincterotomy) versus chemical (botulinum toxin) sphincterotomy as treatment of chronic anal fissure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although both study included relatively large sample size, they are lacking randomization. In contrast, the other three studies we have included, which are all randomized control trials showed a statistically significant lower of incidence of anal incontinence among the Botox injection group in comparison to the LIS group [ [9] , [10] , [11] ], the only limitations in these trials is lack of multicentricity, relatively small sample size.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Although both study included relatively large sample size, they are lacking randomization. In contrast, the other three studies we have included, which are all randomized control trials showed a statistically significant lower of incidence of anal incontinence among the Botox injection group in comparison to the LIS group [ [9] , [10] , [11] ], the only limitations in these trials is lack of multicentricity, relatively small sample size.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Therefore, we suggest that GTN is best alternative of Lateral sphincterotomy. Another study also describe good opinion in favor of surgical treatment that 100% symptomatic in affected individuals after the 6 th weeks, fissure healing was seen in 84.85% during the 6 th week and 100% healing was seen during the 10 th week (22) .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%