2005
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd005329
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surgical approaches in total knee arthroplasty

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Surgical approach: Surgical approaches in TKA include the traditional medial parapatellar [ 44 ], the subvastus surgical approach, characterized by quadriceps preservation [ 45 ] and midvastus surgical approach, a compromise between medial parapatellar and subvastus approach [ 46 ]. The surgical approaches have recently been reviewed in a Cochrane Systematic Review protocol [ 47 ]. The majority of surgeons responded that the surgical approach had no significant impact on patient outcome after TKA, in line with the current literature [ 48 , 49 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Surgical approach: Surgical approaches in TKA include the traditional medial parapatellar [ 44 ], the subvastus surgical approach, characterized by quadriceps preservation [ 45 ] and midvastus surgical approach, a compromise between medial parapatellar and subvastus approach [ 46 ]. The surgical approaches have recently been reviewed in a Cochrane Systematic Review protocol [ 47 ]. The majority of surgeons responded that the surgical approach had no significant impact on patient outcome after TKA, in line with the current literature [ 48 , 49 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All patients had the same implant (Multigen Plus, Lima-Lto, San Daniele, Italy ( Figure 1(a) )) fitted using the standard surgical approach for TKA (medial parapatellar approach) [ 48 ]. Three different surgeons performed the surgery.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, a QS technique can be more difficult in stiff knees or muscular patients, and there is a learning curve for surgeons new to the technique 1,4 . Systematic reviews have indicated that the quality of published trials is poor and no one technique can be considered superior on the basis of the available evidence 2,5 . Most studies were uncontrolled, retrospective case series with small sample sizes, utilizing a variety of outcome measures that were usually not patient-reported 6 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%