Surgery without preoperative histological confirmation of lung cancer: what is the current clinical practice?

Abstract

Background: There are discordances in the guidelines regarding the need to acquire histological diagnosis before surgical treatment of (presumed) lung cancer. Preoperative histological confirmation is always encouraged in this setting to prevent unnecessary surgery or when sublobar resection for small-sized tumors is considered. The aim of this retrospective cohort study was to assess the proportion of patients undergoing lung cancer resection in the Netherlands without preoperative pathological confirmation, based on the intraoperative pathological diagnosis (IOD) rate, and to determine characteristics that may influence IOD frequency. Methods: Data on 10,226 patients, who underwent surgical treatment for lung cancer from 2010 to 2015, were retrieved from the Netherlands National Cancer Registry. We registered an IOD when the date of diagnosis equaled the date of the first surgical intervention. Tabulations and multivariable logistic regression were used to identify predictive parameters for IOD. Results: 36% of surgical procedures were classified as IOD, and decreased with increasing tumor size and extent of surgery (57% for segmentectomy, 39% for lobectomy and 11% for pneumonectomy). IOD was more frequently observed in adenocarcinoma (41%), varied between hospitals from 13% to 66% and was less common when patients were referred from a hospital where thoracic surgery was not performed. Previous history of cancer did not affect IOD. Conclusions: More than one-third of patients with suspected lung cancer in the Netherlands was operated without preoperative histological confirmation. There was significant variation in IOD rates between different hospitals, which deserves further detailed analysis when striving for uniform surgical quality of care for patients with lung cancer.

Radiomics and Artificial Intelligence Can Predict Malignancy of Solitary Pulmonary Nodules in the Elderly

“…These results are consistent with the idea that it is possible to obtain a safe indication in a completely non-invasive way, without proceeding to a pre-surgical biopsy or an avoidable resection. This in line with studies such as that of Ghamati et al, who showed that it is common practice to carry out a lung resection without a preoperative defined diagnosis, risking an increase in the rates of unnecessary surgery [34]. The physician's ability to make a reliable lung cancer diagnosis solely based on clinical and radiologic data in fact represents an undeniable challenge.…”

Surgical Resection of Benign Nodules in Lung Cancer Screening: Incidence and Features

“…In a study of 10,226 patients in Netherlands who underwent surgical resection for lung cancer, more than one-third of the patients were operated without preoperative diagnosis. 29 Not all nodules are amenable to preoperative tissue sampling, either because of size or location, and contraindications to biopsy, such as severe emphysema and pulmonary hypertension. The method and results of the percutaneous biopsy are also operator and technique dependent.…”

Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery Core Needle Biopsy for Pulmonary Nodules in Patients with Impaired Lung Function: Is It Feasible and Safe?

“…1). Diagnostic lobectomy or segmentectomy is commonly performed and usually does not lead to major complications [8,9]. The proportion of pulmonary nodules determined to be cancer in biopsy results varies greatly depending on their size and shape [10,11].…”