1998
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2516.1998.00148.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surgery in Haemophilia: experience from a centre in India

Abstract: The present paper describes various kinds of surgery carried out with great success in 16 cases which included both severe and moderate haemophilia patients with modest amounts of factor concentrates and anti-fibrinolytic drugs. This is very important in developing countries where factor concentrates are not easily available. In one patient haemophilia was diagnosed only after surgery. None of the patients had inhibitor pre- or post-operatively. One patient who was HIV positive underwent orchidectomy successfu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
28
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All our patients except one developed type I inhibitors and only one patient, who developed an inhibitor to FVIII postoperatively and then lost it, developed a type II inhibitor. As many of our patients with severe haemophilia received very little factor concentrate, concern has been voiced that these patients may develop inhibitors in their postoperative period, making this a turbulent time with attendant complications that we may be ill‐equipped to handle because of the nonavailability of FEIBA ® or other alternatives in sufficient quantities [21,22]. Although we have not encountered any such patients before, the present case of postoperative inhibitor development shows it can happen.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…All our patients except one developed type I inhibitors and only one patient, who developed an inhibitor to FVIII postoperatively and then lost it, developed a type II inhibitor. As many of our patients with severe haemophilia received very little factor concentrate, concern has been voiced that these patients may develop inhibitors in their postoperative period, making this a turbulent time with attendant complications that we may be ill‐equipped to handle because of the nonavailability of FEIBA ® or other alternatives in sufficient quantities [21,22]. Although we have not encountered any such patients before, the present case of postoperative inhibitor development shows it can happen.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Briefly, the factor replacement protocol was as follows: 100% correction for the first 3–4 days followed by 50–60% for subsequent 7–8 days. If the patient needed surgical intervention then the factor replacement was given as per our protocol [5]. All the patients were put on dilantin or valproic acid as an anticonvulsant for a period of 2 years after the episode.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These data show that compared with the usual quantities of factor concentrates, lower doses, aimed at maintaining 20–40% levels in the first three to five post‐operative days followed by 10–20% levels during the subsequent days, can reduce factor usage to about 300 IU kg −1 per procedure even with intermittent infusion protocols [18]. These findings have been reconfirmed at a few other centres [19, S. Apte, India; T. Shamsi, Pakistan; personal communications], but they need to be more widely assessed. Our evaluation of factor replacement by continuous infusion for surgery suggests that it may not be possible to reduce the total dose any further even by maintaining 30% factor level during the first three to five post‐operative days and 20% level over the next 2–3 days followed by 10% factor level subsequently [20].…”
Section: Surgery In Haemophiliamentioning
confidence: 69%