2009
DOI: 10.1245/s10434-009-0357-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surgery for Recurrent Ovarian Cancer: Role of Peritoneal Carcinomatosis: Exploratory Analysis of the DESKTOP I Trial About Risk Factors, Surgical Implications, and Prognostic Value of Peritoneal Carcinomatosis

Abstract: Peritoneal carcinomatosis was a negative predictor for complete resection but had no effect on prognosis if complete resection could be achieved. Improving surgical skills might be one step to increase the proportion of patients who might benefit from surgery for recurrent disease.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
68
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 121 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
5
68
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Other key eligibility criteria included Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0-2 23 ; adequate bone marrow, coagulation, and renal (creatinine 1.5 3 institutional upper limit of normal) and hepatic function; signed informed consent; and deemed resectable to no visible residual disease by the investigator based on selection criteria for secondary cytoreductive surgery. [24][25][26] Patients were ineligible if they met any of the following exclusion criteria: pre-existing neuropathy (National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events [NCI-CTCAE] version 3.0) grade >1; known platinum allergy; borderline histology; and other serious disabling diseases that would contraindicate secondary cytoreductive surgery followed by postoperative platinum-based IV chemotherapy.…”
Section: Eligibility Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other key eligibility criteria included Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0-2 23 ; adequate bone marrow, coagulation, and renal (creatinine 1.5 3 institutional upper limit of normal) and hepatic function; signed informed consent; and deemed resectable to no visible residual disease by the investigator based on selection criteria for secondary cytoreductive surgery. [24][25][26] Patients were ineligible if they met any of the following exclusion criteria: pre-existing neuropathy (National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events [NCI-CTCAE] version 3.0) grade >1; known platinum allergy; borderline histology; and other serious disabling diseases that would contraindicate secondary cytoreductive surgery followed by postoperative platinum-based IV chemotherapy.…”
Section: Eligibility Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the recurrent setting, if certain eligibility criteria like ascites below 500 ml, good performance status, and no residual tumor after primary surgery are met [15,16], a secondary cytoreductive surgery is also associated with significantly improved progression-free and overall survival [17,18]. Hyperthermic intraoperative chemotherapy is also a feasible option in platin-sensitive recurrence [19], survival benefit is being evaluated in ongoing prospective trials [20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the largest studies conducted on the theme of the influence on survival of the anatomic site of relapse comes from Petrillo et al demonstrating that cases with isolated lymph node recurrences experience a significantly higher overall survival versus cases with isolated peritoneal lesions or versus cases with isolated parenchymatous lesions, with median progression-free survival being 63 versus 41 versus 24 months (11). In the meantime, the presence of peritoneal carcinomatosis has been reported in up to 70% of patients with recurrent disease but failed to be a negative prognostic factor on the overall survival if complete debulking surgery to no residual disease is feasible (18). The benefits of complete cytoreductive surgery at the time of relapse have been best revealed by Bristow et al's meta-analysis, published in 2009, including 2,019 patients from 40 studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%