2020
DOI: 10.1007/s00345-020-03215-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surgery associated with increased survival compared to radiation in clinically localized Gleason 9–10 prostate cancer: a SEER analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First, the present data validated previously established differences between EBRT and RP patients regarding age, stage and grade 15,16 . In consequence, the SEER database is consistent with other large‐ and small‐scaled databases, in that regard.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…First, the present data validated previously established differences between EBRT and RP patients regarding age, stage and grade 15,16 . In consequence, the SEER database is consistent with other large‐ and small‐scaled databases, in that regard.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…In addition, despite a significant benefit in PCSS with EBRT + BT in the pooled HR analysis, this was not replicated in the pooled survival curve analysis possibly owing to differences in sample size and heterogeneity. A recent Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database study similarly did not identify significant differences in either prostate cancer-specific mortality or overall mortality between EBRT and EBRT + BT on multivariate analysis [30] . Likewise, ASCENDE-RT and other randomized trials have failed to demonstrate an overall survival advantage with the addition of BT boost in high risk prostate cancer, though these studies were not powered to show differences in this endpoint [8] , [9] , [31] , [32] , [33] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%