2015
DOI: 10.1200/jco.2014.60.2177
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surgery After Relapse in Stage I Nonseminomatous Testicular Cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Most patients with TGCTs have a good prognosis; stage I patients who receive only surgical resection have an 85.5-95% 5 year survival rate, and even patients with metastasis still have a cure rate of ∼80%, because TGCTs are sensitive to radiotherapy and chemotherapy, such as cisplatin and other cytostatic agents (1,(4)(5)(6). Previous studies have shown that advanced TNM stage, high serum tumor marker level (7-9), non-seminoma or predominantly embryonal carcinoma histology (10), lymph vascular invasion (11)(12)(13), rete testis invasion (14,15), and large tumor size (15,16) are risk factors of poor prognosis or relapse. However, based on conventional clinical or pathological characteristics, the prediction of recurrence is still not sufficiently accurate and remains controversial in TGCTs (1,15), especially in stage I patients who are subjected to surveillance after radical orchiectomy (5).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most patients with TGCTs have a good prognosis; stage I patients who receive only surgical resection have an 85.5-95% 5 year survival rate, and even patients with metastasis still have a cure rate of ∼80%, because TGCTs are sensitive to radiotherapy and chemotherapy, such as cisplatin and other cytostatic agents (1,(4)(5)(6). Previous studies have shown that advanced TNM stage, high serum tumor marker level (7-9), non-seminoma or predominantly embryonal carcinoma histology (10), lymph vascular invasion (11)(12)(13), rete testis invasion (14,15), and large tumor size (15,16) are risk factors of poor prognosis or relapse. However, based on conventional clinical or pathological characteristics, the prediction of recurrence is still not sufficiently accurate and remains controversial in TGCTs (1,15), especially in stage I patients who are subjected to surveillance after radical orchiectomy (5).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This may be secondary to the frequent presence of tumour‐smearing artefact in seminoma, making identification of genuine LVI challenging (Figure ). For NSGCTs, LVI has been shown in multiple studies to be a powerful predictor of metastatic disease and recurrence . If LVI is present in a mixed or combined germ cell tumour, it is good practice to state which subtype of tumour is showing the LVI, as this may alter clinical management if it is an embryonal carcinoma component showing LVI versus classic seminoma.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For NSGCTs, LVI has been shown in multiple studies to be a powerful predictor of metastatic disease and recurrence. 25,27,[46][47][48][49][50][51] If LVI is present in a mixed or combined germ cell tumour, it is good practice to state which subtype of tumour is showing the LVI, as this may alter clinical management if it is an embryonal carcinoma component showing LVI versus classic seminoma.…”
Section: Y M P H O V a S C U L A R I N V A S I O N ( R E Q U I R E D )mentioning
confidence: 99%