2002
DOI: 10.1067/msy.2002.124733
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surgeons' tone of voice: A clue to malpractice history

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
187
0
5

Year Published

2002
2002
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 377 publications
(197 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
5
187
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…As has been done in similar studies (Ambady, Laplante, Nguyen, Rosenthal, Chaumeton & Levinson, 2002;Harrigan, Gramata, Lucic & Margolis, 1989), the coders' global affect ratings were initially subjected to factor analyses to reduce the number of variables and create composite measures of physician and patient affective communication. The same was done to the items assessing physician perceptions of the patient as a communicator since we did not assume this was a unidimensional scale.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As has been done in similar studies (Ambady, Laplante, Nguyen, Rosenthal, Chaumeton & Levinson, 2002;Harrigan, Gramata, Lucic & Margolis, 1989), the coders' global affect ratings were initially subjected to factor analyses to reduce the number of variables and create composite measures of physician and patient affective communication. The same was done to the items assessing physician perceptions of the patient as a communicator since we did not assume this was a unidimensional scale.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ambady et al investigated the relationship between judgements of surgeons' voice tone and their malpractice claims history. 10 Compared with surgeons with no claims, assessors correctly identified surgeons with previous claims by rating the higher dominance and lower concern for the patient revealed in the surgeon's tone of voice.…”
Section: Physician Behaviour Patterns and Patient Complaints And Litimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Female physicians differ in their communication style from male physicians in very much the same way the sex difference is evident in the normal population. Roter et al [3] showed in their meta-analysis that although there is no difference in the amount of information given to patients between female and male www.elsevier.com/locate/pateducou Patient Education and Counseling 68 (2007) [16][17][18][19][20][21][22] physicians, female physicians have more positive talk (e.g., reassurance, encouragement), show more partnership building behaviors (e.g., eliciting rationale for visit and shared decision making), ask more psychosocial questions (e.g., how the disease affects the patient's daily activities), and focus more on emotions (e.g., empathy, eliciting patient concerns).…”
Section: Physician Sex and Physician Communicationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, patients are less satisfied with a dominant physician than with a non-dominant physician [17,18]. In the same vein, primary care physicians who were never sued by patients were found to adopt a less dominant interaction style than physicians who were sued [19,20]. Physicians who were never sued encouraged patients to voice their opinions, encouraged patients to talk, and informed patients about the structure of the visit [20].…”
Section: Physician Sex and Physician Communicationmentioning
confidence: 99%