Surgeons' Perspectives on Avoiding Nonbeneficial Treatments in Seriously Ill Older Patients with Surgical Emergencies: A Qualitative Study

Abstract

Background: Clinical decisions for seriously ill older patients with surgical emergencies are highly complex. Measuring the benefits of burdensome treatments in this context is fraught with uncertainty. Little is known about how surgeons formulate treatment decisions to avoid nonbeneficial surgery, or engage in preoperative conversations about end-of-life (EOL) care. Objective: We sought to describe how surgeons approach such discussions, and to identify modifiable factors to reduce nonbeneficial surgery near the EOL. Design: Purposive and snowball sampling were used to recruit a national sample of emergency general surgeons. Semistructured interviews were conducted between February and May 2014. Measurements: Three independent coders performed qualitative coding using NVivo software (NVivo version 10.0, QSR International). Content analysis was used to identify factors important to surgical decision making and EOL communication.Results: Twenty-four surgeons were interviewed. Participants felt responsible for conducting EOL conversations with seriously ill older patients and their families before surgery to prevent nonbeneficial treatments. However, wide differences in prognostic estimates among surgeons, inadequate data about postoperative quality of life (QOL), patients and surrogates who were unprepared for EOL conversations, variation in perceptions about the role of palliative care, and time constraints are contributors to surgeons providing nonbeneficial operations. Surgeons reported performing operations they knew would not benefit the patient to give the family time to come to terms with the patient's demise. Conclusions: Emergency general surgeons feel responsible for having preoperative discussions about EOL care with seriously ill older patients to avoid nonbenefical surgery. However, surgeons identified multiple factors that undermine adequate communication and lead to nonbeneficial surgery.

A novel anesthesiologist‐led multidisciplinary model for evaluating high‐risk surgical patients at a comprehensive cancer center

“…First, surgeons are not purposefully trying to perform “inappropriate” surgery. It is not always feasible for the surgical consultation to identify all aspects of the patient's complex history . The preoperative anesthesia evaluation is an opportunity to further investigate these broader issues and intervene .…”

“…It is not always feasible for the surgical consultation to identify all aspects of the patient's complex history. 32 The preoperative anesthesia evaluation is an opportunity to further investigate these broader issues and intervene. 21 As we have seen, neither patient age, ASA PS class, nor comorbidity necessarily guarantees an HRC meeting.…”

Ethical considerations about emergent surgical hospitalizations in patients with advanced cancer

“…Too often, aggressive interventions are performed on patients with advanced cancer near end of life, only to inadvertently prolong the dying process. Factors that contribute to potentially nonbeneficial care include patients and families who are wholly unprepared or unaware of the terminal prognosis and time constraints, which prohibit a nuanced examination of patient goals . In some of these situations, a specialist palliative care or ethics consult may facilitate care that achieves patient goals without causing added harm.…”

Outcomes of emergency abdominal surgery in octogenarians: A single-center analysis

“…5 Among other factors, higher age has been shown to be associated with deficits in surgical decision making. 6 Multidimensional patient-centred approaches 7 and best communication practices 8,9 have been discussed to facilitate decision making in elderly patients with surgical emergencies. Recent studies investigated outcomes of patients >80 years of age undergoing cardiovascular or neurosurgical interventions.…”