DOI: 10.31274/rtd-180813-9402
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surgency bias: effects on teacher performance evaluation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 75 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Evaluators became more effective when they were taught specific components of clinical supervision and were trained in teacher performance evaluation procedures (Faast, 1982;Manatt, 1983). Some studies have indicated that without the proper training, the possibility of rater bias exists among teacher evaluators (D. Newsum, 1990). Manatt and Daniels (1990) reported that when appropriate instruments and methods are utilized, and when extensive training is given, principals are good judges of teacher performance.…”
Section: Training For Cooperating Teachersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evaluators became more effective when they were taught specific components of clinical supervision and were trained in teacher performance evaluation procedures (Faast, 1982;Manatt, 1983). Some studies have indicated that without the proper training, the possibility of rater bias exists among teacher evaluators (D. Newsum, 1990). Manatt and Daniels (1990) reported that when appropriate instruments and methods are utilized, and when extensive training is given, principals are good judges of teacher performance.…”
Section: Training For Cooperating Teachersmentioning
confidence: 99%