The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
1990
DOI: 10.1016/0166-6622(90)80141-p
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surfactant-induced wetting transitions: Role of surface hydrophobicity and effect on oil permeability of ultrafiltration membranes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, there is no substantial adsorption of carboxylates on the paraffin wax, which accounts for little changes in contact angles over the surfactant concentration range studied. The above explanation appears to agree with Keurentjes et al (37) who reported that there was a narrow region of hydrophobicity in which virtually no adsorption of surfactants occurred.…”
Section: Effect Of Surfactant Additionsupporting
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, there is no substantial adsorption of carboxylates on the paraffin wax, which accounts for little changes in contact angles over the surfactant concentration range studied. The above explanation appears to agree with Keurentjes et al (37) who reported that there was a narrow region of hydrophobicity in which virtually no adsorption of surfactants occurred.…”
Section: Effect Of Surfactant Additionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…This orientation is dictated by the competition of hydrophobic interaction with electrostatic interaction between the surfactant and the substrate, and is influenced by the structure of both the surfactant and the substrate, as well as the degree of hydrophobicity of the substrate (37,38). For a strongly hydrophobic surface, it is usually accepted that the hydrocarbon chain of surfactant faces the surface, leaving the polar group exposed to water, and thus causing a reduction in contact angle.…”
Section: Effect Of Surfactant Additionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These are relatively low speeds compared to the studies undertaken by G. K. Auernhammer and his colleagues [21][22][23][24], where dynamic receding contact angle measurements showed a decrease with increasing velocity as well as with increasing surfactant concentrations. It was postulated in [19][20][21][22] that Marangoni stresses were the main contribution to the contact angle shift. These stresses occur due to local surface tension gradients formed close to the three-phase contact line.…”
Section: Dynamic Contact Anglesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Drops deposited on the surface were surrounded by an immiscible liquid with, or without, the presence of surfactant [18,19]. The presence of amphiphilic molecules in a solution affects the wettability of a surface in contact with the solution [20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lin et al [17] and Churaev [18] noted that the existence of a thin water precursor film in contact with the leading edge of the droplet plays a significant role. Keurentjes et al [19] stated that surfactants adsorbed onto a hydrophobic surface expose their polar head groups to the solution, whereas in the case of a more hydrophilic surface, surfactant molecule bilayers might form, rendering the surface more hydrophilic. Moreover, Zhang and Han [20] and Rafaï et al [21] noted that spreading was driven by capillary forces dominated by Marangoni forces with a spreading exponent n above 0.25.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%