SPE Middle East Oil &Amp; Gas Show and Conference 2015
DOI: 10.2118/172700-ms
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surfactant Adsorption in Surfactant-Polymer Flooding for Carbonate Reservoirs

Abstract: Surfactant related chemical flooding has great potential for improving oil recovery in carbonate reservoirs, as surfactants are able to effectively lower the oil/water interfacial tension (IFT) and alter wettability toward water-wet. The loss of surfactant during the propagation process in the reservoir is one of the major concerns in determining the feasibility of a chemical flooding project. Many efforts have been made to reduce the surfactant adsorption in various scenarios to make the project economically … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
37
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
2
37
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…There are reports of several laboratory scale tests and field trials using anionic sulfate and sulfonate surfactants for high-salinity limestone reservoirs (Hirasaki et al 2008;Levitt et al 2006). However, due to the electrostatic force of attraction, they often adsorb strongly on the positively charged limestone surfaces in the presence of dissolved acidic CO 2 at high pressures (Lawson 1978, Wang et al 2015. Cationic surfactants, on the other hand, exhibit low adsorption on carbonate formations, due to the electrostatic repulsion between the cationic head and the positive charge bearing carbonate surface (Hirasaki et al 2008;Ahmadall et al 1993;Lawson 1978).…”
Section: Surfactant Foamsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are reports of several laboratory scale tests and field trials using anionic sulfate and sulfonate surfactants for high-salinity limestone reservoirs (Hirasaki et al 2008;Levitt et al 2006). However, due to the electrostatic force of attraction, they often adsorb strongly on the positively charged limestone surfaces in the presence of dissolved acidic CO 2 at high pressures (Lawson 1978, Wang et al 2015. Cationic surfactants, on the other hand, exhibit low adsorption on carbonate formations, due to the electrostatic repulsion between the cationic head and the positive charge bearing carbonate surface (Hirasaki et al 2008;Ahmadall et al 1993;Lawson 1978).…”
Section: Surfactant Foamsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The potential of this SP slug was previously demonstrated for harsh temperature and salinity conditions (Han et al , 2014Zhou et al 2012;Fuseni et al 2013;Wang et al 2015).…”
Section: Surfactant-polymer Slugmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…4. Surfactant adsorption is reduced by addition of polymer, or vice versa, as there is an adsorption competition between polymer and surfactant [49]. 5.…”
Section: Mechanisms and Synergy In Aspmentioning
confidence: 99%