2012
DOI: 10.14359/51683700
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surface Wave Velocity-Stress Relationship in Uniaxially Loaded Concrete

Abstract: The sonic surface wave (or Rayleigh wave)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
1
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
2
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These observations were also reported in previous studies [40,41]. Shokouhi et al note that the amplitude of the received signal is a more sensitive parameter for assessing damage appearance than the evolution of the time of propagation [42]. However, these two parameters are difficult to evaluate correctly, as a decrease of the amplitude causes the signal to reach the noise level, potentially causing a large error in the determination of the time of propagation.…”
Section: Damage Indexsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…These observations were also reported in previous studies [40,41]. Shokouhi et al note that the amplitude of the received signal is a more sensitive parameter for assessing damage appearance than the evolution of the time of propagation [42]. However, these two parameters are difficult to evaluate correctly, as a decrease of the amplitude causes the signal to reach the noise level, potentially causing a large error in the determination of the time of propagation.…”
Section: Damage Indexsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Besides, the change in stress causes new microcracks to open and further complicates the results' interpretation. This is confirmed by the mathematical model presented in [13]. The dispersion effect is further applied [14].…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 61%
“…In our analysis, the microcrack parameters and material parameters of mortar matrix were adapted to match the material properties of concrete composition provided in [1] (concrete standard AB8 with cement type CEM I 42.5R with water/cement ratio of 0.45). In addition, a sub-model described in [6] is adapted to describe the stiffening effect related to microcrack closure observed in the elastic deformation regime [10]. As a result, a so-called closing pressure parameter (P c = 30M P a) has been introduced.…”
Section: Digital Concrete Twinmentioning
confidence: 99%