2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.csr.2013.11.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surface water circulation patterns in the southeastern Bay of Biscay: New evidences from HF radar data

Abstract: High frequency (HF) radar stations have been working operationally in the southeastern part of the Bay of Biscay since 2009. The (2) systems provide hourly surface currents, with 5 km spatial resolution and a radial coverage lying close to 180 km. The detailed and quantitative description of the spatial patterns observed by the HF radar offers new evidence on the main ocean processes, at different time scales, affecting a study area where surface currents show marked temporal and spatial variability. A clear s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
68
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(81 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
8
68
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4d), the cross-shore weak circulation is not reproduced, with a correlation between model and observation equal to 0.09, due to the mesoscale circulation in this area (e.g. Solabarrieta et al, 2014;Caballero et al, 2016). The agreement between observations and numerical simulation is improved for dominant along-shore currents.…”
Section: Bay Of Biscay General Circulationmentioning
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…4d), the cross-shore weak circulation is not reproduced, with a correlation between model and observation equal to 0.09, due to the mesoscale circulation in this area (e.g. Solabarrieta et al, 2014;Caballero et al, 2016). The agreement between observations and numerical simulation is improved for dominant along-shore currents.…”
Section: Bay Of Biscay General Circulationmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Considered vertical profiles can be divided into two sources: Argo (Argo, 2000;Riser et al, 2016) profiles in the open ocean and RECOPESCA (Leblond et al, 2010;Charria et al, 2014;Lamouroux et al, 2016) profiles on the continental shelf. Figure 5 shows the difference between observed and modelled profiles for the year 2010 in temperature and salinity in the top layers.…”
Section: Vertical Hydrological Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the context of surface currents, a large variety of potential error sources exists, like those associated to open boundary or meteorological forcing, bathymetry errors, bottom roughness errors, or deficiencies in turbulence parametrization. In addition, surface currents are affected by complex coupling processes between the current field, wind driven surface waves and the atmosphere (e.g., Solabarrieta et al, 2014;Staneva et al, 2016). The optimal treatment of these processes in numerical models is still subject of ongoing research and HFR data can play an important role in this context.…”
Section: Applications Of Hfr Measurements In the Framework Of The Eurmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Related to the data uncertainties, it is worth mentioning that a number of validation exercises exist, based on comparisons of HFR currents against independent in situ measurements (Kohut and Glenn, 2003;Kaplan et al, 2005;Paduan et al, 2006;Ohlmann et al, 2007;Cosoli et al, 2010;Lorente et al, 2014Lorente et al, , 2015aSolabarrieta et al, 2014;Kalampokis et al, 2016). These validation exercises can be limited by the fact that part of the discrepancies observed through these comparisons are due to the specificities and own inaccuracies of the different measuring systems (Solabarrieta et al, 2014;Kalampokis et al, 2016). Indeed, the spatial and temporal scales measured with HFR are not the same that those of point-wise acoustic Doppler current profilers or drifters, so it can be expected that vertical or horizontal shear in currents contribute also to the RMSDs observed between measurements.…”
Section: Basic Principles Of Hfr Operation and Data Specificationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the credibility of HF radar data has been previously tested in extensive validation studies, including direct comparisons of HF radar-derived surface currents against independent in situ sensors like moored ADCPs, point-wise current meters -PCMs hereinafter -, drifters or similar Kaplan et al, 2005;Cosoli et al, 2010;Solabarrieta et al, 2014 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%