2005
DOI: 10.1007/s00436-005-1357-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surface ultrastructure of prestomal teeth of some flies in the families Calliphoridae, Muscidae and Sarcophagidae

Abstract: Prestomal teeth of flies in the families Calliphoridae (Chrysomya pinguis, Chrysomya villeneuvi, and Chrysomya chani), Muscidae (Hydrotaea (= Ophyra) chalcogaster) and Sarcophagidae (Boettcherisca peregrina) were presented using scanning electron microscopy. The slight to deep bifurcation of the tips of their teeth were similarly observed in all species examined. The anatomical feature of prestomal teeth of the flies examined may contribute to the understanding of their feeding behavior and the medical importa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
(20 reference statements)
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…the position of abdominal spiracles 2–5 in tergites). Although we agree with Griffiths (1972: 136), who characterized the Calyptratae as ‘one of the most surely grounded monophyletic groups within the Schizophora’, the only unique calyptrate autapomorphy may well be the presence of the distinctively formed prestomal teeth on the proboscis (Iwasa, 1983; Sukontason et al , 2005). With regard to DNA sequence data, calyptrate monophyly was supported in analyses utilizing two ribosomal genes (18S, 16S; Vossbrinck & Friedman, 1989; Nirmala et al , 2001), but these analyses included <20 calyptrate species representing relatively few families and yielded inconclusive or poorly supported trees.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…the position of abdominal spiracles 2–5 in tergites). Although we agree with Griffiths (1972: 136), who characterized the Calyptratae as ‘one of the most surely grounded monophyletic groups within the Schizophora’, the only unique calyptrate autapomorphy may well be the presence of the distinctively formed prestomal teeth on the proboscis (Iwasa, 1983; Sukontason et al , 2005). With regard to DNA sequence data, calyptrate monophyly was supported in analyses utilizing two ribosomal genes (18S, 16S; Vossbrinck & Friedman, 1989; Nirmala et al , 2001), but these analyses included <20 calyptrate species representing relatively few families and yielded inconclusive or poorly supported trees.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…At present, the majority of studies on C. pinguis have been focused on its external morphology [10,18,19], submicroscopic structure [20][21][22], karyotypes [23], geographical abundance [24][25][26][27], myasis [28] and DNA-based techniques used for species identification [17,29,30]. However, there have not been any developmental studies of this species [31].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Antennae and other organs, such as ommatidia, spiracles, pulvilli, and genitalia, are of different functions and play an important role in various behaviors during adult life (Nalbach, ; Dickinson, ; Sherman and Dickinson, ; Sukontason et al, ; Sukontason et al, ; Sukontason et al, ). Ross () described and compared antennal sensilla of several species in this genus, while there is a lack of study of body parts in this genus, as well as in the Diptera.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%