2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2011.08.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surface treatment of wood polymer composites for adhesive bonding

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
39
0
5

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
39
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…The largest contact angle was found in the reference variant, with a mean of 94.1° and the lowest mean, 82.7°, was seen in the modification with H2O. A smaller contact angle is better for the strength of a glued joint (Banea and Silva 2008;Moghadamzadeh et al 2011). The variant with H2O exhibited a significant difference from the others, but there was no significant difference between the reference and NaOH variants.…”
Section: H2omentioning
confidence: 84%
“…The largest contact angle was found in the reference variant, with a mean of 94.1° and the lowest mean, 82.7°, was seen in the modification with H2O. A smaller contact angle is better for the strength of a glued joint (Banea and Silva 2008;Moghadamzadeh et al 2011). The variant with H2O exhibited a significant difference from the others, but there was no significant difference between the reference and NaOH variants.…”
Section: H2omentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Many surface treatment methods, such as flame treatment, water treatment, chromic acid treatment, oxyfluorination treatment, oxygen plasma treatment, and coupling agent coating treatment, are found in the present literature Oporto et al 2007;Laborie and Gupta 2008;Wolkenhauer et al 2008;Moghadamzadeh et al 2011;Sogutlu et al 2016;Sogutlu 2017). Besides the individual surface treatments mentioned, a combined treatment was also employed to treat the WPCs materials.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Gramlich et al (2006) combined flame and water surface treatments to treat the surface of the WPCs. Moghadamzadeh et al (2011) employed a combination treatment of sanding followed by a corona discharge treatment to improve the bonding strengths of the WPCs. The experimental results showed that the combined treatment for the composites would produce better bonding performance, and the combination of the two treatment methods may display an unexpected synergetic action.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dimitriou y colaboradores por ejemplo trataron la superficie de un WPC elaborado con PP y harina de abeto usando peróxido de hidrógeno, logrando un incremento de la fuerza adhesiva de 36,4% (750 N) (Dimitriou et al, 2016). Los tratamientos de oxidación de la superficie por medio de gases ionizados como descarga de corona, plasma a baja presión y plasma son los más comunes en la actualidad (Moghadamzadeh et al, 2011;Oporto et el., 2010) Otra manera para aumentar la energía superficial y por ende la capacidad del substrato para formar uniones adhesivas es mediante la fijación sobre la superficie de sustancias con grupos funcionales o injertos de monómeros polares. Usualmente estas sustancias se aplican en forma de primers.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified